ABSTRACT
Festival producers used their professional cultural expertise to navigate tensions between local and national policies in order to access resources from different funding sources. They did this according to tacit values which defined ‘excellence’ in their artistic fields rather than local communities’ cultural interests. In exploring festival production this paper contributes a critical understanding of how festivals’ governance institutions became exclusive social spaces that, through professional closure based on obscure ‘cultural value’ criteria, limited rather than facilitated social mobilities. In illuminating the role of art forms, funders and festival governance structures as exclusive in-groups, the study runs contrary to common academic and policy narratives which envision festivals as inherently open spaces. Consequently, the paper argues policy makers seeking to achieve socio-cultural outcomes through festivals carefully consider the festival’s cultural field and who is included or excluded from its governance.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Jennie Jordan
Dr Jennie Jordan is Associate Professor in Creative and Cultural Industries in Leicester Castle Business School. Her research interests focus on arts and festivals as influential institutions within urban cultural policy and on questions of cultural inclusion. She has published on festivalisation and creative leadership and the business-side of festival management. She has extensive experience as a senior manager and consultant within the UK working with festivals, arts centres and municipal authority arts services. Her consultancy work includes projects for the Department of Culture, Media and Sport, Arts Council England, Nottingham Playhouse and East Midlands Cultural Consortium.