It Doesn't Taste the same from Someone Else's Plate: The Influence of Culture in Interpersonal Retail Service Evaluations

Abstract

This study reviews the influence of culture in interpersonal servicescapes by examining the restaurant retail setting. Two cultures (Canada and France) are surveyed in order to better understand their retail expectations towards interpersonal servicescapes. Using Hofstede's (1991) cultural dimensions to explain some of the differences between Canadian and French restaurant patrons, this study demonstrates a potentially interesting research avenue in the field of cross-cultural interpersonal services marketing. It demonstrates that cultural dimensions do not operate independently but interdependently. Understanding this can help retailers better explain complex service interactions between countries that may appear similar in terms of various socio-demographic features.

In this exploratory research, a measure via exploratory factor analysis was developed, one that encompasses both the physical and service aspects common to interpersonal servicescape by using personality traits. This measure was tested in order to better understand the service expectations between two cultures, Canada and France. Five dimensional structures were uncovered in both cultures but with different traits and groupings. The differences between the traits uncovered and the overall Canadian and French personality structures find some explanation using Hofstede's (1991) cultural dimensions.

The results of this survey point to a possible explanation as to why when services are transferred between cultures, the perceptions of them can be different and sometimes even lead to service failure. There are clearly some cultural differences between the Canadian and French consumers and their overall expectations regarding their consumption experience.

Reviewing the first factor of the French and Canadian personality structures shows that the individualist/collectivist differences are apparent between the Canadian and the French cultures.

The second dimension also has quite a few traits in common, five, all of which have the personal treatment aspect of the restaurant experience that a service provider would be responsible for: polite, respectful, and dedicated. Notable is that the French dimension does not include the authenticity or the hospitable aspect of the experience but includes even more features that are inherent to the personal interaction, such as charming and courteous.

The third dimension of the Canadian and French structures reflects completely different expectations. Whereas the French dimension centers around energy and enthusiasm, the Canadian version is more laid-back and relaxed. There is extroversion in the French dimension to introversion in the Canadian dimension. This could be explained by differences on the Uncertainty Avoidance dimension as outlined by Hofstede (1991).

The fourth dimension seems to confirm previously outlined cultural differences. Whereas Canadians, being a bit lower on uncertainty avoidance and power distance, prefer an intimate and private experience, the French continue to expect extraversion and inclusive features to their experience.

The fifth dimension is in the French personality structure a clear expression of the high power distance society, where the roles of the players in the restaurant experience are clearly defined and the rules of engagement preserved.

This study demonstrates that different cultures clearly do relate to different expectations regarding interpersonal services. This is apparent in the dimensions that come up in both the French and the Canadian personality structures, not only in terms of how different they are but also in with which cultural dimensions these can be explained. For interpersonal servicescapes, the use of personality traits is interesting as it allows for both physical and service features to be accounted for. Furthermore, the social component inherent to interpersonal servicescapes surfaces in most of the dimensions of the service personality structures.

The quality of social exchanges is extremely important, and this even more so in cross-cultural situations, where the expectations regarding the service experience may vary. As demonstrated by this research and using Hofstede's (1991) paradigm, not all societies will have the same expectations pertaining to the interpersonal services. Furthermore, the traditions surrounding the type of service can also have an impact on the service evaluations and differ between countries and cultures. However, using personality traits may also allow for retailers to see which service traits are common to two or more cultures where they seek to be present, and focus on these in the offering.

The findings demonstrate the importance of the individualist and collectivist dimension for interpersonal servicescapes. This difference between the French and the Canadian personality structure is apparent in the most dominant dimension as well as within others, The findings are a step in explaining how retailers can transfer and then measure interpersonal services across cultures.

#홉훌

i갖빡찾Ei훤 i호째끊‘餐JT~향4홈-ii 置되뼈 1'~化화λ~. 용뼈影 P힘。JJ 홍子뼈理解~~l~λ~、.용엠期望我~l 짜先1'~힘 #~tι (}Jr1좋大σ 法固)。 利l폐 Hofstede 뼈 (1991) 빼호化짧度ξl폐 뼈不 폐 빼解繹}Jr1~拿大法固餐JT)ijî 客뼈不 l략， ~#jf-~iiE明-1‘濟4호 69 有趣혀확짧했城‘ :Il총~化혀λ~Jll젖}흉짧。:i혹홍明 호4ι홉j훌휴 不狼iL:i흔行，1므三옳으í. JJ 依.#.0 :i혹;;y以짧助좋쯤 휩흉~-!i子理解解￥ 흥 깅~69 Jll갖í-zr꾀 하9tro 포作rn 。

4호 i츠4‘探索性%규充，죠探索性因子分析，빡휩~ ili 1' -1‘강쌍生 理디지&용;강面普i훨 i효 rn λ~.용빼λ格特~o :i효J09ï.f홉:#!.풍치 T 홍1tf 69 理解i얄 H~져 #~tι (}Jr1좋大~法固) -'ζ 폐å9Jll 용해期 횡， 0 ~져 #~tι 中均有오i짧쏠杓， 1르윷꺼&떠有不 I핵 빼빼特4正디흥￥ 且。我씨'l~정示1':i혹些特~.iE쩍不폐。 利l좌 Hofstede (1 991) 해호 化짧度解拜T 整休69 }Jr1~拿大λ다法固λ빼λ格쏠쩌

本짜규깡t~송果JJ 필.용特移폐~폐해호化中~1f1뼈感~~올不一 ￥훌至흉쫓tJJl용失멧u선 j훈 因꿇供1'-~;;Y能뼈解拜。~1lJk_ 然， 4호}Jr1~拿大디法E획 j퍼蘭옳zl可有-些호化差휴~~M홈 1~까1~1il69 f폐 혔 죠j커 혜 ，홉1;f.期 뿔 69:f 同。

힘껴핏 法固λ‘디}Jr1~좋大λλ格쏠杓69 第-1‘ 因子홍明4호 }Jr1~拿大 ~~n희 호化中4‘λ초3ι/集休초3ι~ll쿄然不 同。

第二짧度펀i有不 :Ý' 的特tξ 是tro 폐 뼈 ，Jí.1‘，所有i혹 --þ] 회s;fï 1‘ λ웹待遇方面해죠짧좀iJí;我까1， -1‘餐JT Jll 용꿇供험 ~if ~ 융r 有 ~Ltt，훌훗~奉빼li.o {훌4흉注훌 69 풍，法E희홈度不현」흉흉송性~1tf 客}J 面69.ξ짧， 1므 ß총훌多所固有해λ~죠켜b 해特l냥，흉"J :Þ迷λ， 楊楊춰 ~L。

第三짧度빼}Jr1충大~法E희뼈쏠杓反映T 完全不폐빼期훨。 法 E희홉度6선 中I_;是能훌~i썼情，-/호}Jr1~拿大해홉1훌是홍}Jr1平易:ìlí:λå9 f휴행。-1로法固~有차 1허性짧j홍 ， m }Jr1~拿大有I지 I허性짧度。:i츠;;y Jl).}폐 Hofstede (1991)所흉出 웹不嘴￡避免짧度웹不 폐 未解繹。

第띠짧度似乎숙r 以-i.iE셜;械옮뼈~化差휴。}Jr1좋大λ，-/로不補홍 性規避~;fx.:fJ 距萬上협1r&.，훌훌짜훈§합 ~~λ죠광옮，法E획 λ생u쫓 期待차 I허性얘L容쩍特~.iE。

第Jí.~홉度是4호法固빼λ格옹杓中휴 i홉뼈뼈홍i친，-/호훔;fx.利距萬 土合中， 餐JT 所.f;t演쩍角 色쩍 ~f광옮有明Z생하선規셨:~1JII.셋IJ 。

i혹J진빡짧홍明不I되뼈 ~tι嘴훗涉&.헥不同方面빼λ~ 용 t￥6쉰 Jll 용。:i혹4호法固λ~}Jr1~拿太λ해λ格쏠채짧度中~ll明쿄，不1'ít是 1Mf1훌多 4 不l력，他끼]都~;;YJJ…:호化짧度송解繹。~rλ~ Jll 용，性格特4正빼使l좌 ~ll有趣， 因JJ 승;;y ιA 解繹횟休~Jll 용特?正。 }Í 차，:i효4‘土용所固有혀λ~Jll용현，총了服용λ格송성뼈大용F分 홉j홍。

土용交流是非常훌要해，尤其1동 R총호4ι 쩍情ìJt下。-i갖짜규充홍 明，:i훨 i호使l좌 Hofstede(1991 的)æ.式‘，휴不是所;fï 69;f_土율都有tro 同 해期 望되 λ~ 夫 系69.갖í-o }Í 차，1출~해훗행 해Jll종현」한- Jl).影P폐 固되 E희흐 l펙혀不同服용1't11l-~σ:호4ι。 然쩌，J좌 λ格特~;;Y能판J允 i쑤좋홉商，훌촬해~1‘Jll 용特‘린풍常까L뼈4호 g져#~~져#以上~tι 해 쐐‘}J。

쏠果홍明， 集休초x.~~λ초x.웹훌훌性，λ되 λzl핵 69 Jll용69~홉度。:i혹#}Jr1~拿大λσ 法固λλ格쏠杓빼差휴4호옳초훌빼짧j홍上풍쿄쩌易 까L해。~송果4호解繹성훌훌 험能:Þ 1可후융移然E 測훌f총 ~tιλ~、Jll흉;한面춰흙g 助。

Keywords:

• Culture
• Personality
• Interpersonal retail
• Servicescapes
• Individualism

j용짧껴:

• 호化，
• 1‘性，
• λ~쫓쯤，
• Jll용，
• 1‘λ초3ι