142
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Qualitative study of district health board inquiries into mental health related homicide in a New Zealand sample

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 953-968 | Received 16 Jun 2022, Accepted 17 Oct 2022, Published online: 02 Feb 2023
 

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify the methods and content of hospital-based serious incident reviews involving mental health related homicide where a service user was the perpetrator between 2007 and 2017. Eleven reports were obtained from mental health services in New Zealand’s largest city and thematically analysed. Nine used the London protocol to identify clinical and system factors that may have contributed to the serious incident, but there was considerable variation in the way in which it was applied. Feedback to services was inconsistent. The voices of family members of the victims were largely absent and consideration of cultural context was missing. A structured protocol to specifically address the mental health context in New Zealand and internationally could resolve some of these issues and lead to a process that is more likely to provide comprehensive coverage of relevant matters and produce clear recommendations to effect improvements to services.

Ethical standards

Declaration of conflicts of interest

Lillian Ng has declared no conflicts of interest.

Alan F. Merry has declared no conflicts of interest.

Ron Paterson has declared no conflicts of interest.

Sally N. Merry has declared no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Ruth Allen for her assistance with the analysis.

Notes

1 District health boards are responsible for providing or funding the provision of health services in their district.

2 The role of the New Zealand Health and Disability Commissioner is to promote and protect the rights of consumers. This includes the fair, simple, speedy and efficient resolution of complaints.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the University of Auckland Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences under a faculty research development grant (no. 3715260).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.