![Sample our Behavioral Sciences journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110801/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Behavioral-Sciences.jpg"})
Abstract
Child support is one of the defining and under-studied elements of single mothering in contemporary Australia. However, the Australian Child Support Scheme is marked by high levels of debt and unreliable, partial and non-payment, which exacerbate mothers' financial insecurity. Most Australian child support research has focused on the amounts and outcomes of payments. Little is known about how and why mothers and fathers make the child support decisions they do. In this paper, we synthesise data from three interview studies with mothers who were due to receive child support to assess whether they experienced the system as intended. We compare the experience of child support policy ‘on the books’ with its experience by mothers ‘on the ground’. A qualitative approach to mothers' experiences of child support highlights the social meaning of that money and the importance of understanding its transfer and use as embedded in social relations.
Notes
1. These figures refer only to child support arrangements under the auspices of the DHS-CS. Unfortunately, Australia does not have statistical data on the payment practices of people who have private arrangements (that is, they do not lodge arrangements with the Department of Human Services - Child Support (DHS-CS) and do not use the DHS-CS to transfer money.
2. We recognise that sampling strategies contributed to the prevalence of compliance issues in the reported studies: Patrick et al. (Citation2007, Citation2008) study included only mothers with histories of domestic violence, including financial abuse and McKenzie's (Citation2011) purposive sampling of mothers with a variety of payment experiences. However, quantifying compliance rates was not our focus, rather we seek to examine the relational and expressive dimensions of child support.