189
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Socioeconomics, planning, and management

Productivity of a single-grip harvester in a beech dominated stand: a case-study under Bavarian conditions

, &
Pages 100-106 | Received 30 Jun 2017, Accepted 06 Jan 2019, Published online: 05 Feb 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Forest conversion from spruce dominated forests to close-to-nature stands with considerable proportion of deciduous tree species is of high importance in Germany. During mechanized harvesting operations, the complex tree architecture and high wood density of deciduous tree species, in particular of beech, pose a challenge during the processing phase. Usually more powerful machinery is required than for softwood stands of comparable age and tree dimensions. This pilot-study assessed the productivity of a TimberPro 620-E single-grip harvester with a LogMax 7000C harvesting head in a mature mixed-wood stand located in southern Germany. A total of 82 trees previously inventoried were harvested using one of two silvicultural treatments (clear-cut or selective-cut). A conventional time and motion study was performed using a hand-held computer on the selected trees that were harvested. Results demonstrated considerable differences in percent distribution of the harvesting related work cycle elements between the two tested silvicultural treatments, particularly with machine movement. Based on single-tree recovered volume estimations, average harvesting productivity during the clear-cut was 31% higher for spruce compared to beech trees. During the selective-cut, average harvesting productivity was 33.9 m3/PMH0 for spruce compared to 23.4 m3/PMH0 for beech, thus indicating a 45% higher productivity in spruce recorded during the pilot study.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Bavarian Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Forestry. The authors wish to thank Mr. Norbert Harrer and Mr. Wolfgang Mayer from Forstservice Harrer & Mayer GbR for allowing us to perform this study. Special thanks are also given to district forester Mr. Ludwig Forster.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.