ABSTRACT
Purpose
This survey aimed to estimate the incidence and severity of impacted teeth indicated for fenestration or fenestration and traction in patients who visited several dental institutions nationwide in Japan from 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016.
Materials and Methods
An online survey was conducted, and 236 dental institutions responded, with 176 reporting their experience with cases of impacted teeth indicated for fenestration/traction.
Results
Of the 1,683 cases of impacted teeth indicated for fenestration/traction, 434 (25.8%), 391 (23.2%), and 858 (51.0%) were treated using fenestration alone, fenestration/traction, and fenestration/traction and orthodontic treatment, respectively. Impacted teeth were most prevalent in the anterior maxillary region, especially in the canine region, with 435 (24.0%) and 411 (22.7%) impacted teeth on the right and left quadrants, respectively. The most commonly used diagnostic criteria were the radiographic findings of clear inversion or horizontal impaction showing that spontaneous eruption would be difficult in 123 (37.4%) cases. The most severe cases indicated for fenestration/traction were those with two or more impacted teeth, observed in 279 (56.7%) cases, followed by 174 cases of root resorption of adjacent teeth (35.4%). Root resorption due to impacted teeth was most prevalent in the maxillary left lateral incisors, evident in 65 cases (24.5%).
Conclusion
This study found that impacted teeth often have serious sequelae such as root resorption of adjacent teeth. Thus, early detection and intervention of impacted teeth, as well as preoperative and postoperative orthodontics to establish a physiologically normal occlusion, are necessary.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our appreciation to Dr. Shujiroh Makino and Dr. Morio Tonogi of the Japanese Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons as well as Dr. Yoshimori Uchikawa and Dr. Hiroyuki Suzuki from the Japanese Society of Pediatric Dentistry, and the Japanese Orthodontic Society for their support to this research. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability
The datasets generated in this study will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Informed consent
This study used data from an online survey, and the participating institutions provided only anonymized data and were given the chance to opt-out. Therefore, informed consent was not required according to the ethics review board.
Ethical approval statement
This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Clinical and Epidemiology Research, Japan Society of Orthodontics (Approval number: 2017-01).