Understanding policy responses to COVID-19: the stars haven’t fallen from the sky for scholars of public policy

ABSTRACT

Responses to COVID-19 across the globe are immensely varied and often perplexing. Policy levers, from mask wearing and social distancing to lockdowns and school closures, have been adopted and avoided with equal conviction by decisions makers who believe their measures are appropriate. In some contexts, the global pandemic has been treated with due seriousness by governments and political leaders while in others it has been downplayed to such an extent that it has been framed as a hoax. Every response to the pandemic has produced seemingly zero-sum debates and disputes over the veracity of knowledge bases, while uncertainty reigns as one of the few constants in decision making arenas. While it may be tempting to gravitate to the view that this unimaginable crisis is beyond the capacity of policy scholars to understand, this introductory article sets the scene for dispelling such a notion. It highlights how a number of core policy issues and perspectives, including the politics of problem framing, the limits of an evidence-based approach, and the nature of the public sector, can help bring analytical insights to this unprecedented crisis.

KEYWORDS:

• Coronavirus
• public policy
• policy sciences
• crisis management
• COVID-19 responses

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Allan McConnell

Allan McConnell is Professor Emeritus, Department of Government and International Relations, University of Sydney. He has published widely on public policy issues such as policy success/failure, hidden agendas, wicked problems, placebo policies and COVID governance.

Alastair Stark

Alastair Stark is Senior Lecturer in the School of Political Science and International Studies, University of Queensland. His expertise and publications include crisis management, institutionalization and participatory modes of governance, institutional amnesia, post-crisis inquiries and lesson-learning.