Policy support for rural economic development based on Holling’s ecological concept of panarchy

Abstract

Globally, rural regions are searching for innovative growth opportunities to reinvigorate their economies. This paper examines the redevelopment of rural communities through an ecological lens – based on the notion of continuous cycles of adaptive change within complex systems as first identified within Holling’s concept of panarchy. Panarchy suggests that complex systems have more than a single equilibrium point and, instead, have some inherent resiliency based on the notion of multiple stable regimes. As such, panarchy provides a conceptual model that describes the ways in which complex social and ecological systems are organized and structured both spatially and temporally. By drawing parallels between the characteristics of ecological communities and rural economic systems, a novel framework is developed to assist policy-makers reflect on a rural community’s position along its own adaptive change cycle and, then, implement appropriate inventions to improve system resiliency – which in this case is linked with economic resiliency through development and/or growth. Supported by empirical data emerging from both key informant interviews and content analysis of current rural development policy, this work also identifies leverage points where policy intervention may be most advantageous by specifying the timing of policy instruments on the cycle. Specifically, this framework describes four leverage points, three major and one minor, to help push or pull rural regions into an area of higher resilience.

Keywords:

• adaptive change cycle
• regional development
• resilience
• resource-dependent communities
• rural economic development

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the 12 economic development officials from the four Atlantic Canada provinces who participated in this study. We appreciate the time they took to participate in interviews and the thoughtful and knowledgeable answers they provided.

Additional information

Funding

This study is supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council graduate scholarship to principal investigator, Penny Slight. Additional funds to support the analysis and dissemination of this research were provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council [grant number 605-2010-0015] to Dr Michelle Adams. This study was undertaken with oversight and approval from Dalhousie University’s Social Science and Humanities Research Ethics Board, Halifax, Nova Scotia.