396
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A comparative assessment of land management approaches in Bhutan

, , &
Pages 143-151 | Received 17 May 2017, Accepted 09 Jul 2017, Published online: 20 Jul 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Arable land in Bhutan is under serious threats of land degradation. Proper land management approach is needed to control soil erosion problems. This study is an attempt to characterize and document the conventional and the community-based land management approaches, applied in Chukha and Dagana districts, respectively. The study tried to make a comparative assessment of their social, economic and environmental impacts on the participating farmers. Farmers’ level of participation in the program, implementation of the soil erosion control measures (SECM) and subsequent social, economic and environmental impacts were found to be significantly influenced by the type of approach applied. The study found that community-based approach is by any means better suited for the study sites than the conventional approach. The social, economic and environmental attributes of respondents from the community-based approach were found to have improved significantly as compared to the conventional approach. The community-based approach was thus found to have a higher potential to meet the diverse requirements of rural subsistence farming communities in Bhutan than the conventional approach.

View correction statement:
Corrigendum

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for allowing us to carry out this study. The financial support to carry out the field survey provided by SLM Project is greatly appreciated. We are also grateful to the Dasho Dzongdas of Dagana and Chukha Dzongkhag for allowing us to conduct the field study in their Dzonkhags. We are also grateful to all 126 farmer-respondents for sparing their valuable time in providing with all those valuable information, perceptions and thoughts.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The financial support to carry out the field survey provided by SLM Project is greatly appreciated.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.