521
Views
75
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The determinants of CO2 emissions in MENA countries: a responsiveness scores approach

& ORCID Icon
Pages 522-534 | Received 09 Jan 2019, Accepted 07 Apr 2019, Published online: 27 Apr 2019
 

ABSTRACT

This paper examines the relationship among carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, GDP, and energy in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries by using a Responsiveness Scores (RS) approach. Empirical results over the period 1971–2013 suggest that GDP per capita and energy consumption show positive RSs, while trade and urban population negative ones. Moreover, energy consumption and urban population reveal moderate increasing returns to scale, while GDP per capita exhibits decreasing positive returns. Furthermore, three-way factors analysis sets out that most of the countries lays on regions with moderate negative Total Responsiveness Scores (TRS). This means that when all factors are jointly increased, CO2 emissions have a moderate decrease. In addition, some GCC countries present a different pattern compared to the average pattern of MENA countries. Finally, radar plots indicate that, overall, RS pattern over factors is moderately heterogeneous within GCC countries, with larger variability appearing in the response to urban population and GDP.

Supplemental material

Supplementary data for this article can be accessed here

Notes

1. It is true that, under certain conditions, a simple bivariate regression could not lead to biased estimates of the coefficients (intercept and slope). However, as the Simpson’s paradox (Simpson Citation1951) makes clear, not taking into account the presence of possible ‘confounders’ can lead to paradoxical conclusions such as a positive effect of x on y in sample subgroups, and a negative one in the entire sample.

2. As beta-coefficients are measured in standard deviations, they can be compared. The meaning of a beta-coefficient is straightforward: suppose that in a regression of y on x the beta is found to be equal to 0.3, then it means that one standard deviation increase in x leads to a 0.3 standard deviation increase in the predicted y, with all other variables in the model held constant (ceteris paribus assumption).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.