1,761
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Influence of the natural setting on environmental education outcomes

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 613-631 | Received 04 Nov 2019, Accepted 01 Mar 2020, Published online: 16 Mar 2020
 

Abstract

Environmental education (EE) typically occurs in natural settings, which research suggests may enhance learning outcomes. Although field trips are commonly used to teach EE, few studies have isolated the influence of different setting characteristics for enhancing participant outcomes during an EE field trip. According to the literature, certain attributes of the natural setting, including novelty, beauty, and naturalness, as well as how the setting is used such as through place-based education, immersion, and time spent inside vs. outside, are thought to positively impact people’s experiences with nature. In this study, we collected data from 334 EE field trip programs for 5-8th grade students to investigate the influence of these natural setting characteristics on positive learning outcomes. Results suggest that the naturalness and novelty of the setting, the use of place-based education, and spending more time outside vs. inside all positively correlated with more positive student outcomes. The implications of the results for environmental educators are discussed.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Acknowledgements

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation and the Institute for Museum and Library Services.

Notes

1 To account for the potential unequal weighting of specific subscales in the EE21 index, we also calculated a standardized EE21 index score using z scores from each subscale and reran all analyses presented in this paper. The results/significant pathways on all tests did not change. We also controlled for the influence of majority race of group and grade level by group mean centering EE21 data and the results/significant pathways also did not change.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for the study was provided by the National Science Foundation’s Advancing Informal STEM Education program Pathways Award (DRL 1612416) and the Institute for Museum and Library Services National Leadership Grant (MG-10-16-0057-16).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.