Abstract
Data envelopment analysis or DEA is a standard methodology for assessing technical efficiency. In many DEA applications, e.g. in the case of schools or hospitals, the issue arises of calculating efficiency in the presence of nondiscretionary/environmental inputs. We propose a three-stage DEA model to address the environmental input issue, and we provide a simulation analysis that illustrates the implementation and potential advantages of our approach relative to the leading existing multi-stage model of nondiscretionary inputs.
Acknowledgements
Professors Gronberg and Jansen thank The Private Enterprise Research Center at Texas A&M University for financial support for this research.
Notes
1 Examples of applied DEA studies include Ray (Citation1991), Valdmanis (Citation1992), Kooreman (Citation1994), Ruggiero (Citation1996), Ruggiero and Vitaliano (Citation1999), Johnes (Citation2006), Pilyavsky et al. (Citation2006), McEachern and Paradi (Citation2007), Denizer et al. (Citation2007), Hollingsworth (Citation2008), Agasisti (Citation2011), Burney et al. (Citation2011).
2 If zl is favourable, we could replace it with a series of Maxj (zlj) – zlj before solving the optimization problem in this stage.
Ray, S. (1991) Resource use efficiency in public schools, A Study of Connecticut Data. Management Science, 37, 1620–8. Valdmanis, V. (1992) Sensitivity analysis for DEA models: an empirical example using public vs. NFP hospitals. Journal of Public Economics, 48, 185–205. Kooreman, P. (1994) Nursing home care in the Netherlands: a nonparametric efficiency analysis, Journal of Health Economics, 13, 301–16. Ruggiero, J. (1996) Efficiency of educational production: an analysis of New York school districts, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 499–509. Ruggiero, J. and Vitaliano, D. F. (1999) Assessing the efficiency of public schools using data envelopment analysis and frontier regression, Contemporary Economic Policy, 17, 321–31. Johnes, J. (2006) Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education, Economics of Education Review, 25, 273–88. Pilyavsky, A., Aaronson, W., Bernet, P. et al. (2006) East-west: does it make a difference to hospital efficiencies in Ukraine?, Health Economics, 15, 1173–86. McEachern, D. and Paradi, J. (2007) Intra- and inter-country bank branch assessment using DEA, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 27, 123–36. Denizer, C., Dinc, M. and Tarimcilar, M. (2007) Financial liberalization and banking efficiency: evidence from Turkey, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 27, 117–95. Hollingsworth, B. (2008) The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery, Health Economics, 17, 1107–28. Agasisti, T. (2011) The efficiency of Italian secondary schools and the potential role of competition: a data envelopment analysis using OECD-PISA2006 data, Education Economics, 1–25. doi:10.1080/09645292.2010.511840. Burney, N. A., Johnes, J., Al-Enezi, M. et al. (2011) The efficiency of public schools: the case of Kuwait, Education Economics, 1–20. doi:10.1080/09645292.2011.595580.