281
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

You should know better! Do health students have different risk attitudes to unplanned pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases?

, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
 

ABSTRACT

Because healthcare professionals are in the best position to assess, assist and educate those participating in risky sexual behaviour, understanding if (and how) their risk attitudes differ from the wider population is of vital importance. In this study, we explore university health students’ risk attitudes towards unplanned pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). We examine whether university students pursuing health-related degrees, who hypothetically should have more exposure to and understanding of the risks associated with unplanned pregnancy and STD, have more risk averse attitudes to sexual behaviour. We find that health students’ sexual attitudes are significantly more risk averse than those of their nonhealth peers in relation to STDs but not unplanned pregnancy. In line with previous research, age and no previous sexual history (virginity) appear to increase risk-averse attitudes to both unplanned pregnancy and STDs. Moreover, males and singles are more risk seeking in their sexual attitudes. These findings suggest that, because unplanned pregnancy and STDs are ongoing global issues, further research is warranted into the risk attitudes of those healthcare professionals most able to provide education and support for individuals participating in risky sexual behaviour.

JEL CLASSIFICATION:

Acknowledgements

Stephen Whyte acknowledges funding support from an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship and QUT Human Research Ethics Committee (approval no. 15000001085).​​

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.​​

Notes

1 Condoms, contraceptive pill, sex during menstruation, intrauterine devices, withdrawal method, contraceptive implant, oral sex, physical contact, kissing, digital penetration, anal penetration, vaginal penetration.

Additional information

Funding

Stephen Whyte acknowledges funding support from an Australian Government Research Training​​ Program Scholarship and QUT Human Research Ethics Committee (approval no. 15000001085).​​

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.