287
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Forthcoming Special Issue on: Visual Search and Selective Attention

The influence of selection modality, display dynamics and error feedback on patterns of human foraging

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 626-648 | Received 01 Mar 2019, Accepted 13 Aug 2019, Published online: 26 Aug 2019
 

ABSTRACT

In previous studies, we have used an iPad task to explore how humans “forage” through static displays containing multiple targets from two categories. When demands on attention were increased, foraging patterns tended to shift from random category selection to exhaustive category selection. Here, we used the same task on a vertically oriented touch-screen. In separate blocks, static or dynamic target items were selected using different modalities, specifically: (a) mouse (b) touchscreen or (c) infrared hand tracker. Although the different selection modalities varied considerably in terms of familiarity and difficulty of use, there was a minimal effect on the patterns of foraging. While there was a consistent reduction in the number of category switches with increased attentional load, the tendency to use exhaustive runs was much reduced, particularly with dynamic displays. We suggest that this pattern is a consequence of generally slowed response times. These findings indicate that in addition to capacity limits, temporal constraints are likely to be an important determinant of foraging patterns in humans. We introduce the term “foraging tempo” to capture this latter notion and to emphasize the probable role played by the overall pace of the regular, repetitive selections required during multi-target search tasks.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Marthese Borg, Daniela Cassar, Miko Darmanin and Jeremy Mifsud for help with data collection. We are also grateful for Tram Nguyen for commenting on an earlier version of the paper. IMT’s research is supported by the Academic Work Resource Fund and the University Research Fund of the University of Malta. AK was supported by the Icelandic Research Fund (grant #152427) as well as a grant from the Research Fund of the University of Iceland.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

IMT’s research is supported by the Academic Work Resource Fund and the University Research Fund of the University of Malta. AK was supported by the Icelandic Research Fund (grant #152427) as well as a grant from the Research Fund of the University of Iceland.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.