216
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Opinions

Dividing attentional capture

ORCID Icon
Pages 592-595 | Received 07 Mar 2021, Accepted 13 Apr 2021, Published online: 28 Sep 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Is capture automatic or under our control? In a recent review, Luck and colleagues [Luck, S. J., Gaspelin, N., Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition, 29(1), 1–21.] provide an important milestone for gauging our (attention researchers) progress with this question. While it may sometimes feel like we have made little progress, this article highlights major advances in our understanding of the tools/paradigms used to study capture, which culminated recently in a discovered role for suppression in regulating capture. Although valuable guidance for future research is offered, I argue that the article falls short in this area. The framework for integrating models of capture is too narrow and ignores the potential for stimuli to evoke multiple attentional effects.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada: [grant number RGPIN-2018-04689].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.