Dogs and modernity: dogs in history and culture

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

^1.Bradshaw, In Defence of Dogs, 274–5.

^2.Ritvo, Animal Estate.

^3.Atkins, Animal Cities.

^4.Kete, Beast in the Boudoir and Grier, Pets in America.

^5.Pemberton and Worboys, Mad Dogs and Englishmen; Pemberton, “Bloodhounds as Detectives,” 69–91; Pemberton, “Hounding Holmes,” 454–67; Barr, “Use of Dog Sledges,” 257–72; Preece and Clewlow, “William Youatt and Byron's ‘Favourite’ Dog,” 10–15; Urdank, “The Rationalisation of Rural Sport,” 65–82; Adams, “Emily Brontë and Dogs,” 167–81.

^6.Kean, “Traces and Representations,” 54–71; Kean, Animal Rights; Morse and Danahay, Victorian Animal Dreams; Boddice, History of Attitudes and Behaviours.

^7.Haraway, When Species Meet. See also Cole et al., “Speciesism, Identity Politics and Ecocriticism,” 87–106.

^8.Pearson, “Dogs, History and Agency,” 128–45.

^9.Rajamannar, Reading the Animal; Brown, “The Lady, the Lapdog and Literary Alterity,” 31–45; Cheang, “Women, Pets and Imperialism,” 359–87; Fudge, Pets; Walker-Miekle, Medieval Dogs.

Additional information

Funding

This dossier originated in a workshop supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council, AH/H030808/1.

Notes on contributors

Julie-Marie Strange

Neil Pemberton is a post-doctoral research fellow at the Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Manchester.

Julie-Marie Strange is Professor of British History at the University of Manchester.