Farewell to WMD: The Language and Science of Mass Destruction

Abstract

This article critically assesses the ongoing use of the term ‘weapons of mass destruction’ (WMD) in policy and academic discourse. Nuclear, biological and chemical weapons are commonly lumped together as WMD, but such conflation is misleading from a technological viewpoint and renders the term vulnerable to political manipulation. There are important scientific and strategic differences between weapon types, and glossing over these leads to confusion in accurately assessing and effectively addressing threats of mass destruction. WMD-based language obscures the paramount threat of nuclear weapons, exaggerates the destructive power of chemical weapons, and is unhelpful or counterproductive when used in the context of biological weapons. In the areas of deterrence, defence, and non-proliferation, WMD-based language can mischaracterize the challenges that are uniquely associated with each weapon type, and this potentially generates adverse security consequences flowing from the implementation of inadequate or misdirected countermeasures. The article concludes that it would be both desirable and feasible to abandon the term ‘WMD’.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author is grateful to Aaron Karp, Colin McInnes, Andrew Phillips, Simon Rushton, Hugh White, and the CSP reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.

Notes

William Safire, ‘On Language; Weapons of Mass Destruction’, New York Times Magazine, 19 April 1998, p. 22.

John Baylis and Mark Smith, ‘The Control of Weapons of Mass Destruction’, in John Baylis, James Wirtz, Colin S. Gray and Eliot Cohen (eds), Strategy in the Contemporary World, 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 232.

John F. Kennedy, ‘Radio and Television Report to the American People on the Soviet Arms Buildup in Cuba’, October 22, 1962.

George H.W. Bush, ‘Excerpts From Bush's Speech at the Opening of the U.N. General Assembly’, New York Times, 26 September 1989, available at http://www.nytimes.com/1989/09/26/world/excerpts-from-bush-s-speech-at-the-opening-of-the-un-general-assembly.html

W. Seth Carus, ‘Defining ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’', Occasional Paper 4, Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction, National Defense University, Washington DC, 2006.

Bob Graham and Jim Talent, ‘World at Risk’, Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, Washington DC, December 2008. Government report, available at http://www.preventwmd.org/report/

US Department of Defense, ‘Quadrennial Defense Review Report’, 12 February 2010, p. 35.

US Department of Defense, ‘Nuclear Posture Review Report’, April 2010. Available at http://www.defense.gov/npr/

Gregg Easterbrook, ‘Term Limits: the Meaninglessness of “WMD”’, The New Republic, 7 October 2002, pp. 22–5; John Mueller and Karl Mueller, ‘The Methodology of Mass Destruction: Assessing Threats in the New World Order’, Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1 (2000), pp. 163–187; Wolfgang K.H. Panofsky, ‘Dismantling the Concept of “Weapons of Mass Destruction”’, Arms Control Today, April 1998. Available at http://www.armscontrol.org/act/1998_04/wkhp98

Carus, ‘Defining “Weapons of Mass Destruction”’ (note 5), p. 7.

‘Global Warming a ‘Weapon of Mass Destruction’', Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 29 July 2003; Colin L. Powell, ‘Interview with Dorota Warkomska of Poland[s TVP2 "Panorama" Program’, US Department of State, 1 August 2004; Joby Warrick, ‘Officials Fear Toxin Ingredient in Botox Could Become a Terrorist Tool’, Washington Post, 25 January 2010, p. A01; Martin Donohoe, ‘Cigarettes: The Other Weapons of Mass Destruction’, Medscape, 4 April 2005, available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/501586_3; Neil Syson, ‘Saddam Most Deadly WMD’, The Sun, 26 April 2005, available at http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article106466.ece.

US Code, Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 113B, § 2332a.

Carus, ‘Defining “Weapons of Mass Destruction”’ (note 5), p. 10.

‘Pipe Bomber Pleads Guilty to WMD Charge’, Global Security Newswire, 23 September 2009, available at http://gsn.nti.org/gsn/nw_20090923_4901.php; ‘Chilling Plot: Suspect Hit Beauty Stores for Bomb Supplies’, Sydney Morning Herald, 25 September 2009, available at http://www.smh.com.au/world/chilling-plot-suspect-hit-beauty-stores-for-bomb-supplies-20090925-g5ai.html; ‘Airline Bomb Suspect Faces WMD Charge’, Global Security Newswire, 7 January 2010, available at http://gsn.nti.org/gsn/nw_20100107_8222.php; Lisa Millar, ‘Man Charged over Times Square Bomb’, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 5 May 2010, available at http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/05/2890389.htm.

Joseph Cirincione, Jon B. Wolfsthal, and Miriam Rajkumar, Deadly Arsenals: Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Threats, 2nd edition (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2005), p. 3.

Partnership for a Secure America, ‘WMD Report Card’, 5 March 2009, available at http://www.psaonline.org/article.php?id=487.

National Security Strategy (Washington DC: White House, 2010), p. 8.

L.W. McNaught, Nuclear Weapons and Their Effects (London: Brassey's, 1984), pp. 25, 29.

Susan B. Martin, ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction: A Brief Overview’, in Sohail H. Hashmi and Steven P. Lee (eds), Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Religious and Secular Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 19.

McNaught, Nuclear Weapons and Their Effects (note 18), pp. 19–20.

Scott Shane, ‘F.B.I. Shuts Book on Anthrax Case Fatal to 5 in 2001’, New York Times, 20 February 2010, p. A1.

T.J. Torok et al. ‘A Large Community Outbreak of Salmonellosis Caused by Intentional Contamination of Restaurant Salad Bars’, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 278, No. 5 (1997), pp. 389–95.

WHO, Health Aspects of Chemical and Biological Weapons (Geneva: WHO, 1970), pp. 98–9.

Matthew Meselson, Jeanne Guillemin, Martin Hugh-Jones, Alexander Langmuir, Ilona Popova, Alxis Shelokov, and Olga Yampolskaya, ‘The Sverdlovsk Anthrax Outbreak of 1979’, Science, Vol. 266 (18 November 1994), pp. 1202–8; Dean A. Wilkening, ‘Sverdlovsk Revisited: Modeling Human Inhalation Anthrax’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 103, No. 20 (2006), pp. 7589–94.

Malcolm Dando, Bioterror and Biowarfare (Oxford: One World, 2006), pp. 110–7.

Michael L. Moodie, ‘The Chemical Weapons Threat’, in Sidney D. Drell, Abraham D. Sofaer, and George D. Wilson (eds), The New Terror: Facing the Threat of Biological and Chemical Weapons (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1999), pp. 14–16.

Steven L. Hoenig, Handbook of Chemical Warfare and Terrorism (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2002), p. 29.

Deborah Haynes, ‘Tokyo Was Target for Death on Grand Scale’, The Times, 26 June 2009, p. 23.

Ibid.

Ibid.

Mueller and Mueller, ‘The Methodology of Mass Destruction’ (note 9), p. 168.

Ibid.

John Mueller, ‘Simplicity and Spook: Terrorism and the Dynamics of Threat Exaggeration’, International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 6, No. 2 (2005), p. 219.

Ibid.

‘Additional Death Counted in Tokyo Sarin Attack’, Global Security Newswire, 9 March 2010. Available at http://gsn.nti.org/gsn/nw_20100308_6468.php

Thomas L. McNaugher, ‘Ballistic Missiles and Chemical Weapons: The Legacy of the Iran-Iraq War’, International Security, Vol. 15, No. 2 (1990), p. 30.

Ibid, p. 31.

OTA, Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Assessing the Risks (Washington DC: OTA, 1993), p. 52.

‘Death Toll in Dresden Raids Lower than Thought’, Sydney Morning Herald, 19 March 2010, available at http://www.smh.com.au/world/death-toll-in-dresden-raids-lower-than-thought-20100318-qif6.html.

Martin, ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’ (note 19), p. 19.

See, for example, Bruce Bennett, ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction: The North Korean Threat’, Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, Vol. 16, No. 2 (2004), p. 100; Gregory Koblentz, ‘Pathogens as Weapons: The International Security Implications of Biological Warfare’, International Security, Vol. 28, No. 3 (2003/04), p. 88; Susan Wright, ‘Terrorists and Biological Weapons: Forging the Link in the Clinton Administration’, Politics and the Life Sciences, Vol. 25, Nos. 1-2 (2007), p. 66.

OTA, Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (note 38), p. 52.

Ibid., p. 54.

Ibid., p. 52. Emphasis added.

Ibid.

Maureen Dowd, ‘Liberties; Anthrax, Shmanthrax’, New York Times, 19 November 1997, available at http://www.nytimes.com/1997/11/19/opinion/liberties-anthrax-shmanthrax.html

George W. Bush, ‘Address to the Nation on War with Iraq’, White House, Washington DC, 17 March 2003. Emphasis added.

Sara A. Carter, ‘Al Qaeda Eyes Bio Attack from Mexico’, Washington Times, 3 June 2009, available at http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/3/al-qaeda-eyes-bio-attack-via-mexico-border/

See, for example, Daniel J. Kevles, ‘The Poor Man's Atomic Bomb’ (review of War of Nerves: Chemical Warfare from World War I to Al-Qaeda, by Jonathan B. Tucker), New York Review of Books, Vol. 54, No. 6 (2007); Neil C. Livingstone and Joseph D. Douglas, CBW: the Poor Man's Atomic Bomb (Cambridge, MA: Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, 1984).

OTA, Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (note 38), p. 52.

Susan B. Martin, ‘The Role of Biological Weapons in International Politics: The Real Military Revolution’, Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1 (2002), p. 64.

See Koblentz, ‘Pathogens as Weapons’ (note 41), pp. 101–7.

Richard M. Price, The Chemical Weapons Taboo (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997), p. 151.

Ibid, p. 151.

George Perkovich, ‘Deconflating “WMD”’, Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission Paper No. 17, Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, Stockholm, 2004, p. 9.

Susan B. Martin and Scott D. Sagan, ‘Correspondence: Responding to Chemical and Biological Threats’, International Security, Vol. 25, No. 4 (2001), p. 198.

Malcolm R. Davis and Colin S. Gray, ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’, in John Baylis, James Wirtz, Eliot Cohen and Colin S. Gray (eds), Strategy in the Contemporary World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 265.

Ibid.

Panofsky, ‘Dismantling the Concept of ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’' (note 9).

‘National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction’ (White House, Washington DC, 2002), available at http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd-17.html

Scott D. Sagan, ‘The Case for No First Use’, Survival, Vol. 51, no. 3 (2009), p. 176.

‘We'll Use Nukes, Says Chirac’, Canberra Times, 21 January 2006, p. 20.

US Department of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review Report (note 8), p. 16.

Carrie Johnson, Carol D. Leonnig and Del Quentin Wilber, ‘Scientist Set to Discuss Plea Bargain in Deadly Attacks Commits Suicide’, Washington Post, 2 August 2008, p. A01.

Easterbrook, ‘Term Limits’ (note 9), p. 22.

Carus, ‘Defining “Weapons of Mass Destruction”’ (note 5), p. 6.

Panofsky, ‘Dismantling the Concept of ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’' (note 9).

‘Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction’ (Prime Minister's Office, United Kingdom, 24 September 2002), available at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.number10.gov.uk/Page 271

George W. Bush, ‘Remarks by the President on Iraq’, White House, Washington DC, 7 October 2002. Available at http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021007-8.html

Charles Duelfer, ‘Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD’, (Central Intelligence Agency, 2004), available at https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/general-reports-1/iraq_wmd_2004/glossary.html

Joseph Cirincione, Jessica T. Mathews, and George Perkovich, WMD in Iraq: Evidence and Implications (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2004), pp. 53–4.

Ibid.

Ibid., p. 12.

National Academy of Sciences, Chemical and Biological Terrorism: Research and Development to Improve Civilian Medical Response (Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1999), p. 13.

Torok et al., ‘A Large Community Outbreak of Salmonellosis’ (note 22), p. 393.

Price, The Chemical Weapons Taboo (note 53), p. 13.

Benedict Brogan, ‘Syria Asserts its Right to Chemical Weapons’, Sydney Morning Herald, 7 January 2004, available at http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/01/06/1073268041503.html

US Department of State, ‘The Global Challenge of WMD Terrorism’ (Chapter 4), Country Reports on Terrorism, 2008, available at http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2008/122437.htm

Ibid.

Bob Graham and Jim Talent, ‘Bioterrorism: Redefining Prevention’, Biosecurity and Bioterrorism, Vol. 7, No. 2 (2009), p. 126.

David R. Franz, Susan A. Ehrlich, Arturo Casadevall, Michael J. Imperiale, and Paul S. Keim, ‘The “Nuclearization” of Biology is a Threat to Health and Security’, Biosecurity and Bioterrorism, Vol. 7, No. 3 (2009), pp. 243–4.

Marc L. Ostfield, ‘Strengthening Biodefense Internationally: Illusion and Reality’, Biosecurity and Bioterrorism, Vol. 6, No. 3 (2008), p. 262. Original emphasis.

C.A.J. Coady, ‘Natural Law and Weapons of Mass Destruction’, in Sohail H. Hashmi and Steven P. Lee (eds), Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Religious and Secular Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 119.

Thomas L. McNaugher, ‘Ballistic Missiles and Chemical Weapons: The Legacy of the Iran–Iraq War’, International Security, Vol. 15, no. 2 (1990), p. 32.

Carus, ‘Defining “Weapons of Mass Destruction”’ (note 5), p. 2.

Stephanie Peatling, ‘War on Terrorism is Over … in Lexicon’, Sydney Morning Herald, 7 July 2009, available at http://www.smh.com.au/national/war-on-terrorism-is-over-in-lexicon-20090706-dail.html; David Miliband, ‘In Fighting Terrorism, the Rule of Law Model is Stronger Than Any Army’, Sydney Morning Herald, 15 January 2009, available at http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/in-fighting-terrorism-the-rule-of-law-model-is-stronger-than-anyarmy/2009/01/15/1231608880942.html; Spencer S. Hsu and Joby Warrick, ‘Obama's Battle against Terrorism to Go Beyond Bombs and Bullets’, Washington Post, 6 August 2009.

National Security Strategy (note 17).

‘MTCR Guidelines’, available at http://www.mtcr.info/english/guidetext.htm

‘Interdiction Principles for the Proliferation Security Initiative’, Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

United Nations Security Council, Resolution 1540, 28 April 2004, S/RES/1540 (2004).

‘Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies’, 1967.

‘Treaty on the Prohibition of the Emplacement of Nuclear Weapons and Other Weapons of Mass Destruction on the Sea-Bed and the Ocean Floor and in the Subsoil Thereof’, 11 February 1971.

David P. Fidler, ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction and International Law’, ASIL Insights, February 2003. Available at www.asil.org/insights/insigh97.htm

Carus, ‘Defining “Weapons of Mass Destruction”’ (note 5), p. 3.

Ibid., p. 2.

Baylis and Smith, ‘The Control of Weapons of Mass Destruction’ (note 2), p. 232.