Cultural landscapes: a bridge between culture and nature?

Abstract

Cultural landscapes are intended to increase awareness that heritage places (sites) are not isolated islands and that there is an interdependence of people, social structures, and the landscape and associated ecological systems. The paper explores whether the recognition of the 1992 World Heritage Cultural Landscape categories, the IUCN Protected Landscapes and the 2005 merging of cultural and natural criteria for World Heritage purposes have been effective in bridging the gap between culture and nature philosophically and in practice. With particular reference to opportunities presented in the Asia-Pacific region, where traditionally culture and nature are not regarded as separate, people are part of nature, the paper will further critically review the nature–culture link and its implications for North American-style national parks where cultural associations may not be seen to be necessary or even desirable. It suggests the imperative of highlighting and respecting in heritage nominations and inscriptions deep cultural associations of traditional communities with natural sites and implications for management to protect cultural and biological diversity and the need for thematic studies.

Keywords:

• cultural landscapes
• protected landscapes
• cultural and biological diversity
• traditional communities

Notes

1. ICOMOS International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites.

2. Global Strategy accessed at whc.unesco.org/en/globalstrategy.

3. Franz Boas, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Boas.

4. See (UNESCO) World Heritage Centre - Cultural Landscapes: http://whc.unesco.org/en/culturallandscape/.

5. NB Dresden Elbe Valley, Germany, was delisted by the World Heritage Committee in July 2009.