Graham Gibbs and his colleagues at Oxford Brookes University have done much to promote parity of esteem for teaching with research in UK universities, to advance high quality teaching and learning throughout the higher education sector, and to innovate with teaching, learning and assessment methods in an era of rapidly diminishing resources. Thus it is a pity that his recent paper in this journal fails to display the rigour of analysis and standard of argument that one expects in an academic journal (Gibbs, 1995). His polarisation of teaching and research as conflicting rather than complementary activities, his unsubstantiated empirical generalisations, and his intemperate descriptions of academic colleagues will only harden divisions rather than promote reasoned debate.
Quality in Research, Quality in Teaching and Quality in Debate: a response to Graham Gibbs
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.