![Sample our Bioscience journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5925/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Bioscience.jpg"})
Abstract
Buccal cells are increasingly used as a source of quality DNA to improve participation rates in molecular studies. Here, three buccal cell collection protocols were compared to determine factors affecting the yield of cells, total DNA per sample, and DNA yield per cell. In addition, kinetic quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (TaqMan™) was used to quantify human DNA available for PCR. The method of collection used influenced the overall DNA yield per sample. The collection buffer used influenced the number of cells but not the overall DNA yield per sample. Repeated freezing and thawing did not affect overall DNA yield per sample, DNA yield per cell, or the total number of cells collected. Mouthwashes had the highest DNA yield per sample (20.8 μg) compared with cytobrush samples (1.9 μg from three cytobrushes) and tongue depressors (0.8 μg from three tongue depressors). However, mouthwash samples may contain significant non-human DNA and other contaminants that could interfere with some molecular studies. Spectrometry grossly overestimated the total DNA recovered from mouthwash samples compared with fluorometry or quantitative PCR.