LEARNING BY PROGRAMMED AND GUIDED DISCOVERY METHODS AT DIFFERENT AGE LEVELS

Abstract

A comparison was made between learning by programmed and guided discovery methods at four age levels. Eighty female subjects, age range 10 to 66 years, were given a specially prepared course of instruction in binary number. Within each of the four age groups (means 11 years, 21 years, 40 years 6 months and 57 years 5 months) the subjects were randomly assigned so that equal numbers learnt by programmed and discovery methods.

Subjects were tested for arithmetical ability, and a follow‐up test in binary number was administered. An attitude questionnaire was completed by each subject to elicit learning mode preferences.

The results showed a significant positive correlation between the standardised arithmetic test scores and the binary criterion test scores obtained from both the experimental methods of learning, but the correlation was stronger for the programmed method. The youngest and the oldest groups learnt significantly better by the guided discovery method.

The subjects tended to prefer the experimental methods of learning rather than the methods of learning to which they were accustomed.

Notes

* Now at Audio‐Visual Aids and Programmed Learning Unit, University of Liverpool.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

G. H. Jamieson*

* Now at Audio‐Visual Aids and Programmed Learning Unit, University of Liverpool.