1,109
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Factors supporting the implementation of integrated care between physical and mental health services: an integrative review

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 245-258 | Received 17 May 2020, Accepted 07 Dec 2020, Published online: 13 Jan 2021
 

ABSTRACT

In Australia and internationally there is a strong policy commitment to the redesign of health services toward integrated physical and mental health care. When executed well, integrated care has been demonstrated to improve the access to, clinical outcomes from, and quality of care while reducing overtreatment and duplication. Despite the demonstrated effectiveness and promise of integrated care, exactly how integrated care is best achieved remains less clear. The aim of this review study was to identify factors that support the implementation of integrated care between physical and mental health services. An integrative review was conducted following the framework developed by Whittemore and Knafl, with quantitative and qualitative evidence systematically considered. To identify studies, Medline, PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL were searched for the period from 2003 to 2018, and reference lists of included studies and review articles were examined. Nineteen studies were included. Synthesis of study findings identified seven key factors supporting the implementation of integrated care between physical and mental health services: (a) adequate resourcing, (b) shared values, (c) effective communication, (d) information technology (IT) infrastructure, (e) flexible administrative organizations, (f) role clarity and accountability, and (g) staff engagement and training. There was little theoretical development in included studies, with little insight into the contextual factors or underlying mechanism required to support the implementation of integrated care initiatives. This review identified a set of inter-related barriers and facilitators which, if addressed, can improve the implementation and sustainability of truly integrated care.

Author contributions

All authors have contributed significantly. DDC had the idea for the study and developed the initial proposal together with JT. DDC and DLC did the literature search and data extraction. DDC drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version of this manuscript submitted.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Professor Fiona Brooks for feedback on the initial protocol.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this study was received from the University of Technology Sydney, Health Future Development Grant.

Notes on contributors

Dominiek Coates

Dominiek Coates is a social scientist with expertise in health services research, translational research and implementation science.

Danielle Coppleson

Danielle Coppleson is the Mental Health Access and Pathways to Care Lead for South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (SESLHD).

Jo Travaglia

Jo Travaglia is health sociologist and adult educator with a background in health services research, management and leadership.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.