International advocacy for contract-based public private partnerships through case studies: a re-interpretation of Southern Cross Station, Melbourne

ABSTRACT

In response to urban infrastructure deficits, international organisations, such as the United Nations, encourage governments to harness private finance. Contract-based Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) represent one policy option enabling infrastructure to be privately financed and constructed, and for service provision to occur. With PPPs also a contested policy option, private sector policy intermediaries advocate for their adoption, including through the selective promotion of case studies. In recognition that favourable case study narratives may leach out local context, a multi-dimensional analytical framework is introduced distinguishing between de-institutionalised, aspatial, non-historical, uncritical and non-futuristic perspectives. Recently the private sector-led World Economic Forum published ‘Harnessing Public-Private Cooperation to Deliver the New Urban Agenda’, which reported upon the PPP-led development of Spencer Street (or Southern Cross) Station in Melbourne, Australia. In deploying the framework, this paper concludes that case study narratives can be reductionist and locally detached in various ways. The role of policy intermediaries in the transfer of policy information therefore requires carefully interpretation, not least because of the malleable use of case studies to reveal desired conclusions.

KEYWORDS:

• Public private partnerships (PPPs)
• urban development
• infrastructure
• policy transfer
• advocacy
• case studies

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to the reviewers, including the editor, for their comments and support.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes on contributor

Steven R. Henderson has research interests relating to urban and regional development and governance. He has published in a range of related journals.