The essential contestability thesis continues to enjoy widespread support, and has been invoked as an explanatory fact in analysing ideological morphology. This paper argues, however, that the general form of the thesis faces incoherence or failure: it violates plausible constraints on concept-possession, and is forced to rely either on an esoteric doctrine which shortcircuits the thesis's original explanatory rationale, or on an error theory which cannot do the explanatory job the thesis requires. The thesis started by aiming to explain a common political phenomenon, that of endemic disagreement, but is forced to turn away from the world of politics towards ideal theory. The limit of explanation is reached when we apply the thesis to the concept of politics itself. For the point of essential contestability was to understand political disagreement, and if the thesis is true of politics itself, it is not clear how the explanandum can even be specified. This casts doubt on the viability of political design, the characteristic project of modern philosophical liberalism, since it is not clear that the project can even be coherently specified in advance of politics.
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.