Silence in political theory: A conceptual predicament

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size

Notes

^1. T. Carlyle, Past and Present, Book 3, Chapter 5, available at http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/13534.

^2. K. Ferguson, ‘Silence: a politics’, Contemporary Political Theory, 2 (2003), p. 53.

^3. W. Tie, ‘Radical politics, utopia, and political policing’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 14 (2009), p. 255.

^4. M. Freeden, The Political Theory of Political Thinking: The Anatomy of a Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 92–131.

^5. B. Lincoln, Authority: Construction and Corrosion (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974), pp. 9–10.

^6. P. Lyman, ‘The Domestication of Anger: The Use and Abuse of Anger in Politics’, European Journal of Social Theory, 7/2 (2004), p. 138.

^7. Ferguson, op.cit., Ref. 2, p. 51.

^8. P. Pettit, Republicanism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997); Q. Skinner, Liberty Before Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

^9.http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-intergenerational/#RigFutPeoVisVisPreLivPeo

^10. L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd., 1922), p. 23.

^11. R. Bajpai, Debating Difference: Group Rights and Liberal Democracy in India (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2011).

^12. J.S. Mill, ‘On liberty’, in J.M. Robson (Ed) Collected Works of John Stuart Mill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977), vol. 18, pp. 223–227.

^13. T. Olsen, Silences (New York: Feminist Press, 2003).