1,342
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Navigating complex social landscapes: examining care experienced young people’s engagements with sport and physical activity

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 15-28 | Received 28 Aug 2019, Accepted 27 Nov 2019, Published online: 04 Dec 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Internationally, there has been growing interest in the experiences of care experienced youth and their engagements with activities that can support positive development. Despite the acknowledged potential of sport/physical activity (PA) to act as a vehicle for positive development, there remain concerns about the piecemeal nature of sport/PA opportunities for care experienced youth at a local level and their capacity to access these. To date, relatively few studies have considered the role of sport/PA within the day-to-day lives of care experienced young people and, furthermore, these have often drawn more on the voices of adults than care experienced youth themselves. In response, the ‘Right to be Active’ (R2BA) project was developed to examine care experienced youth’s perspectives on/experiences of sport/PA. This paper seeks to provide a broad overview of the study and discusses key empirical findings. Adopting a predominantly qualitative, participatory approach, R2BA comprised four interconnected phases: (1) a rapid review of policy documents; (2) the distribution of adult and young people surveys; (3) focus group interviews with 63 care experienced youth; and (4) repeat focus groups with 40 care experienced youth. Informed by Bourdieu’s theoretical concepts and his perspectives regarding the multi-dimensional nature of social life, the analysis of data highlights the complex social landscapes that care experienced youth navigate on a day-to-day basis. Moreover, it demonstrates how the configuration of key factors (activities, places and people) can be influential in shaping care experienced youths’ attitudes towards, participation in and experiences of sport/PA within the broader field of the care context. It is argued that the study points to the need for a more holistic understanding of care experienced young people’s lives and for more thought to be given as to how different stakeholder groups can work in partnership to facilitate this population’s access to/engagements in sport/PA.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 ‘Children in need’ are defined as either those needing the provision of services to achieve or maintain a reasonable standard of health or development, or those who are disabled.

2 Rapid reviews are a simplified approach to synthesising research evidence and are typically used when there is a tight timeframe for study. While not as rigorous as full systematic reviews, they do share many of the same features and have been shown to provide valuable evidence that can usefully inform decision making processes (see Khangura, Konnyu, Cushman, Grimshaw, & Moher, Citation2012).

3 In the UK, a local authority is an organisation that is officially responsible for all the public services and facilities in a particular area.

4 While the number of responses received for the youth survey are low, it should be noted that the response rate is comparable to other studies in this area (e.g. Timpson, Eckley, & Lavin, Citation2014; Quarmby et al., Citation2019). Low numbers are thus relatively common and perhaps reflect the challenges of accessing the perspectives of this hard-to-reach population (O’Donnell et al., Citation2019).

5 In order to preserve anonymity, the focus group contexts are not named here but are instead referred to by an allocated number, context 1 being FG1, context 2 being FG2, etc.

6 In order to indicate the known care contexts in which respondents lived, the following key is used: FC (Foster Care), KC (Kinship Care), CH (Children’s Home), IL (independent living). NB. This information was only available for survey respondents.

7 Independent visitors are volunteer adults who befriend and spend time with a child who is in care.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the British Academy under [grant number SG150535].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.