248
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A concept for mitigating head injury under translational blunt impact

, &
Pages 483-494 | Received 22 Oct 2014, Accepted 03 Apr 2015, Published online: 28 May 2015
 

Abstract

This study assesses a bi-layer composite concept for mitigating the severity of injury due to translational blunt impact of an unprotected head at moderately high speeds. The concept comprises crushable foam and a stiff face-sheet on the impacting face. Approximate analytical models for acceleration–time histories of prototypical impact scenarios are used to guide the design. The key design variables probed experimentally are the crushing strength of the underlying foam and the tile size. The efficacy of the composite systems and the foams alone is ascertained through a series of drop impact tests with an instrumented head-form at a representative impact velocity (6.7 m/s, 15 mph), using three commercial viscoelastic foams, with and without face-sheets. The measurements are analysed in terms of five performance metrics: the peak acceleration, the Gadd severity index (GSI), the head injury criterion (HIC), the skull fracture correlate (SFC) and the head impact power (HIP). The experiments demonstrate that, with the addition of a face-sheet, each of these metrics can be reduced substantially (by as much as a factor of two) relative to those of the foam alone. The benefits derive from spreading of contact forces over a larger area of foam by the face-sheet.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies through grant W911NF-09-0001 from the US Army Research Office. The content of the information does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the Government and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Note

Notes

1. Although this study was not designed to address specific applications, the foam thickness (38 mm) selected for the experimental portion is broadly consistent with the expected allowable thickness of impact protection systems for cabin interiors of automobiles (∼25–50 mm). Similarly, the impact velocity was selected to be consistent with the test standards employed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies [grant W911NF-09-0001] from the US Army Research Office.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.