How do fiscally decentralized federations fare in times of crisis? Insights from Switzerland

ABSTRACT

This article examines federal dynamics during times of crisis in fiscally decentralized federations using Switzerland as an example. Based on qualitative research, we analyse how the relationship between the federal government and the cantons evolved during the recent ‘Great Recession’ and ensuing financial crisis. We contend that fiscally decentralized structures, as well as the consensus-oriented institutions of the political system, protect the federal balance of power. Our results show that Switzerland indeed adapted well to the crisis of the 2009 economic recession. However, the deficit crisis has revealed challenging coordination problems, notably in the areas of fiscal equalization and corporate taxation, which have the potential to put federal stability under stress. So far, the system has adapted well and safeguarded the federal order. Due to its combination of fiscally decentralized institutions and a strong consensus culture, Switzerland has proven to be a particularly robust federation.

KEY WORDS:

• Economic and financial crisis
• debt crisis
• federal dynamics
• Switzerland

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. NZZ, 31 May 2010.

2. The Swiss Confederation, Federal Statistical Office, accessed 22 February 2015, http://www.amstat.ch/v2/index.jsp.

3. NZZ, 9 and 15 September 2009, NZZ, 21 December 2011.

4. NZZ, 3 July 2009.

5. Schweizerische Depeschenagentur, 2 April 2009.

6. All the references Interview FDK refer to an interview that we conducted with a member of the FDK on 10 January 2012.

7. NZZ, 23 March 2009.

8. Interview FDK.

9. VDK Press Release, 16 February 2011; VDK Press Release, 31 August 2011.

10. Interview FDK.

11. Press Releases KDK, 28 May and 9 November 2010. The KDK is the Conference of the Cantonal Governments (Konferenz der Kantonsregierungen).

12. Interview with the Cantonal Conference of Financial Directors.

13. NZZ, 27 June 2014.

14. NZZ, 27 June 2014.

15. NZZ, 30 April 2015. Although the SNB managed to reduce the deficit during the second and third quarter of 2015, the annual deficit remains at 33 billion Swiss francs after the third quarter NZZ, 31 July and 30 October 2015.

16. NZZ, 2 February 2015.

17. NZZ, 21 September 2013 and 17 April 2015; VDK Press Release 2014: http://www.vdk.ch/media/archive2/archiv/standortpromotion/02a_VDK_MedienmitteilungZahlenStandortfrderung2013.pdf, last access 15 January 2015.

18. On 15 October 2013, Switzerland signed the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters with the OECD: http://www.oecd.org/newsroom/switzerland-signs-multilateral-convention-on-mutual-administrative-assistance-in-tax-matters.htm, last access 20 November 2015.

19. Both profit from these tax credits, although the federal government benefits less than the cantons.

20. Handelszeitung, 1 July 2014.

21. NZZ, 16 July 2014.

22. NZZ, 15 January and 1 April 2015.

23. Summary of the reform process on the homepage of the federal parliament: http://www.parlament.ch/d/suche/seiten/legislaturrueckblick.aspx?rb_id=20140066, last access: 16 October 2015.

24. NZZ, 02 July 2014; Tagesanzeiger 8 July 2014.

25. NZZ, 14 February 2014.

26. NZZ, 12 December 2014, 11 February 2015, 10 March 2015.

27. Summary of the reform process on the homepage of the federal parliament: http://www.parlament.ch/d/suche/seiten/legislaturrueckblick.aspx?rb_id=20140066, last access: 16 October 2015.

28. NZZ, 8 October 2015.

29. NZZ, 16 July 2014 and 22 September 2014.

30. NZZ, 2 April 2015.

31. NZZ, 10 October 2014. With regard to health policy, read Uhlmann and Braun (2011).

32. The following contributions are a debate by experts on Swiss federalism in the NZZ: http://www.nzz.ch/schweiz/dossiers/schweizer-foederalismus-in-bewegung-2.49763, last access 17 October 2015.

33. NZZ, 30 October 2014.

34. NZZ, 15 October 2014 and 21 October 2014.