The presentation of facts and rendering them credible is a difficult task in court. There are several reasons. First, the court, particularly in the case of a jury, will not be accustomed to the subtleties in special fields so that things have to be simplified without adulterating the truth. Second, the latter risk is just that of avoiding the twin hazards of Scylla and Charybdis: that one simplifies too much or overlooks something so that the evidence fades away in cross-examination. The third reason is that not every means is adapted in the same manner to convey that which should be made understandable. The diversity of means of presentation together with the advantages and risks are evaluated and discussed.
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.