755
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Performance‐based funding as an instrument of competition in German higher education

, &
Pages 3-23 | Published online: 08 Mar 2007
 

Abstract

A central theme of approaches to new public management is the emulation of the market through state‐induced competition. Basing state funding allocations on comparative performance is one way of setting an incentive for competitive practice amongst universities. Reforms in funding allocation have occurred in Germany at both state and university level. These have concentrated on indicator‐based models, and an analysis of these procedures is the focus of this article. In general, it can be concluded that indicator‐based models are used extensively at state and university level and that their general structure suggests a ‘tool box’ of indicators, commonly used at both levels. In many cases, performance‐based funding only determines a marginal part of total budget allocations and discretionary, incremental funding dominates. Besides being a question of allocation model construction, this has both to do with the continuing need to improve institutions' capability to compete with one another and—directly connected to this—the reluctance by many German states to complete the transition to ‘steering at a distance’. The article concludes with an outlook for the future of models of performance‐based funding in Germany.

Notes

1. Ziegele (Citation2004) provides a more detailed discussion of the interdependence between financing and organizational autonomy under the term ‘institutional economics’.

2. For each course of study, there is a fixed amount of semesters that is set as the ‘regular study duration’ (Regelstudienzeit), this relates to the expected amount of time required by a student to complete the course (e.g. it is longer for medicine students and shorter for students of business studies). Many students, however, exceed this time for a number of different reasons.

3. To improve the comparability of data, decentralization and the importance of various allocation components are expressed here as a proportion of the state subsidy, which universities receive. This sum has been adjusted to exclude any grants for capital, medical faculties and facilities.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.