Middle Powers and the Behavioural Model

Abstract

The behavioural model comprises a major theoretical tradition in the field of middle powers since it identifies the distinct behavioural patterns in the diplomacy of these states. Its relevance, however, has been questioned since it continues to rely on older definitions of middle power behaviour and places emphasis on diplomatic preferences rather than influence. To strengthen the relevance of the behavioural model, this article proposes an additional distinctive category that prioritises ideational influence and entrepreneurial effectiveness as key prerequisites for identifying middle powers. The article examines the cases of Brazil and South Africa to argue that states classified as middle powers must not only pursue the diplomatic preferences and strategies that comprise middle power internationalism, but also display the capacity to advance and secure their preferred outcomes at the international level.

About the Author

Charalampos Efstathopoulos is Lecturer in International Politics at Aberystwyth University, Wales, UK. He is the author of Middle Powers in World Trade Diplomacy: India, South Africa and the Doha Development Agenda (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015). His research focuses on Southern middle powers, global trade politics and Indian and South African foreign policy.

Notes

1 Andrew F. Cooper, “Squeezed or Revitalised? Middle Powers, the G20 and the Evolution of Global Governance”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 6 (2013), pp. 963–984.

2 Bruce Gilley and Andrew O’Neil, “China’s Rise through the Prism of Middle Powers”, in Bruce Gilley and Andrew O’Neil (eds.), Middle Powers and the Rise of China (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2014), pp. 1–22; Hongying Wang and Erik French, “Middle Range Powers in Global Governance”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 6 (2013), pp. 985–999.

3 Charles-Philippe David and Stephane Roussel, “‘Middle Power Blues’: Canadian Policy and International Security after the Cold War”, The American Review of Canadian Studies, Vol. 28, No. 1 (1998), pp. 131–156, at p. 135.

4 Ibid.

5 J.L. Granatstein, Canadian Foreign Policy since 1945: Middle Power or Satellite? 3rd ed. (Toronto: The Copp Clark Publishing Company, 1973); John W. Holmes, The Better Part of Valour: Essays on Canadian Diplomacy (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart Limited, 1970); Carl Ungerer, “The ‘Middle Power’ Concept in Australian Foreign Policy”, Australian Journal of Politics and History, Vol. 53, No. 4 (2007), pp. 538–551.

6 Jonathan H. Ping, Middle Power Statecraft: Indonesia, Malaysia and the Asia-Pacific (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005), pp. 1–8.

7 Allan Patience, “Imagining Middle Powers”, Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 68, No. 2 (2014), pp. 210–224.

8 Nikola Hynek, “Humanitarian Arms Control, Symbiotic Functionalism and the Concept of Middlepowerhood”, Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2007), pp. 132–155, at p. 139.

9 Ibid., p. 141.

10 Robert W. Cox, “Middlepowermanship, Japan, and Future World Order”, in Robert W. Cox with Timothy J. Sinclair, Approaches to World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 241–275, at p. 242.

11 Andrew F. Cooper, In Between Countries: Australia, Canada, and the Search for Order in Agricultural Trade (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1997), p. 7.

12 Leif-Eric Easley, “Middle Power National Identity? South Korea and Vietnam in US-China Geopolitics”, Pacific Focus, Vol. XXVII, No. 3 (2012), pp. 421–442, at p. 422.

13 Gilley and O’Neil, “China’s Rise”, op. cit., p. 15.

14 Andrew F. Cooper, Richard A. Higgott and Kim Richard Nossal, Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order (Vancouver: UBC Press, 1993), pp. 19–25.

15 Ibid.

16 Adam Chapnick, “The Middle Power”, Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2 (1999), pp. 73–82, at p. 76.

17 Justin Robertson, “Introduction: The Research Direction and a Typology of Approaches”, in Justin Robertson and Maurice A. East (eds.), Diplomacy and Developing Nations: Post-Cold War Foreign Policy-Making Structures and Processes (Abingdon: Routledge, 2005), pp. 1–35, at pp. 19–24.

18 James Manicom and Jeffrey Reeves, “Locating Middle Powers in International Relations Theory and Power Transitions”, in Gilley and O’Neil, Middle Powers and the Rise of China, op. cit., pp. 23–44, at p. 31.

19 John Ravenhill, “Cycles of Middle Power Activism: Constraint and Choice in Australian and Canadian Foreign Policies”, Australian Review of International Affairs, Vol. 52, No. 3 (1998), pp. 309–327, at p. 325.

20 Ibid.

21 Soon-ok Shin, “South Korea’s Elusive Middlepowermanship: Regional or Global Player”, The Pacific Review, Vol. 29, No. 2 (2016), pp. 187–209, at p. 192 (emphasis in original).

22 Ibid.

23 Ibid., p. 191.

24 Ronald M. Behringer, “The Dynamics of Middlepowermanship”, Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, Vol. 14, No. 2 (2013), pp. 9–22, at p. 14.

25 Matthew Stephen, “The Concept and Role of Middle Powers during Global Rebalancing”, Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, Vol. 14, No. 2 (2013), pp. 36–52.

26 Gilley and O’Neil, “China’s Rise”, op. cit., p. 15; Manicom and Reeves, op. cit., p. 33.

27 Stephen, op. cit., p. 39.

28 Hynek, op. cit., pp. 139–140.

29 Ibid., p. 140.

30 Andrew Carr, “Is Australia a Middle Power? A Systemic Impact Approach”, Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 68, No. 1 (2014), pp. 70–84, at p. 74.

31 Eduard Jordaan, “The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers”, Politikon, Vol. 30, No. 2 (2003), pp. 165–181; Ping, op. cit.

32 Gilley and O’Neil, “China’s Rise”, op. cit., p. 10.

33 Cooper, “Squeezed or Revitalised?”, op. cit.

34 Azyumardi Azra, “Indonesia’s Middle Power Public Diplomacy: Asia and Beyond”, in Jan Melissen and Yul Sohn (eds.), Understanding Public Diplomacy in East Asia: Middle Powers in a Troubled Region (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), pp. 131–154.

35 Simon Reich and Richard Ned Lebow, Good-Bye Hegemony! Power and Influence in the Global System (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2014), pp. 36–49.

36 Cranford Pratt, “Middle Power Internationalism and Global Poverty”, in Cranford Pratt (ed.), Middle Power Internationalism: The North-South Dimension (Kingston, Montreal and London: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1990), pp. 3–24.

37 Mikko Kuisma, “Social Democratic Internationalism and the Welfare State after the ‘Golden Age’”, Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 42, No. 1 (2007), pp. 9–26.

38 Laure Neack, The New Foreign Policy: US and Comparative Foreign Policy in the 21st Century (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003), pp. 165–166; Nicholas J. Wheeler and Tim Dunne, “Good International Citizenship: A Third Way for British Foreign Policy”, International Affairs, Vol. 74, No. 4 (1998), pp. 847–870, at pp. 853–857.

39 Gareth Evans, “Middle Power Diplomacy”, Inaugural Edgardo Boeninger Memorial Lecture (29 June 2011), available: <http://www.gevans.org/speeches/speech441.html> (accessed 1 March 2017).

40 Kim Richard Nossal, “Pinchpenny Diplomacy: The Decline of ‘Good International Citizenship’ in Canadian Foreign Policy”, International Journal, Vol. 54, No. 1 (1998/99), pp. 88–105, at p. 100.

41 Andrew Linklater, “What Is a Good International Citizen”, in Paul Keal (ed.), Ethics and Foreign Policy (North Sydney, NSW: Allen & Unwin, 1992), pp. 21–43, at pp. 32–33.

42 Ibid., p. 36.

43 Tim Dunne, “Good Citizen Europe”, International Affairs, Vol. 84, No. 1 (2008), pp. 13–28, at pp. 25–26.

44 Andrew Phillips, “The Wars on Terror, Duelling Internationalisms and the Clash of Purposes in a Post-Unipolar World”, International Politics, Vol. 50, No. 1 (2013), pp. 77–96.

45 Kim Richard Nossal and Richard Stubbs, “Mahathir’s Malaysia: An Emerging Middle Power?” in Andrew F. Cooper (ed.), Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War (London: Macmillan Press, 1997), pp. 147–163, at p. 151.

46 Alan K. Henrikson, “Middle Powers as Managers: International Mediation within, across and outside Institutions”, in Cooper, Niche Diplomacy, op. cit., pp. 46–72.

47 Janis Doran, Middle Powers and Technical Multilateralism: The International Telecommunications Union (Ottawa: The North-South Institute, 1989), p. 4.

48 Maxi Schoeman, “South Africa as an Emerging Middle Power”, African Security Review, Vol. 9, No. 3 (2000), pp. 47–58.

49 Bernard Wood, “Middle Powers in the International System: A Preliminary Assessment of the Potential”, Working Paper 11 (Ottawa: The North-South Institute, 1987), pp. 25–26.

50 Doran, op. cit., p. 4.

51 Nossal and Stubbs, op. cit., p. 151.

52 Carr, op. cit., p. 79.

53 Fen Osler Hampson, “A New Role for Middle Powers in Regional Conflict Resolution?” in Brain L. Job (ed.), The Insecurity Dilemma: National Security of Third World States (London and Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1992), pp. 191–208, at p. 201.

54 Ibid., pp. 203–204.

55 Cox, op. cit.; Jordaan, “The Concept of a Middle Power”, op. cit.; Mark Neufeld, “Hegemony and Foreign Policy Analysis: The Case of Canada as Middle Power”, Studies in Political Economy, Vol. 48 (1995), pp. 7–29.

56 David and Roussel, op. cit., p. 135.

57 Andrew F. Cooper, “Niche Diplomacy: A Conceptual Overview”, in Cooper, Niche Diplomacy, op. cit., pp. 1–24.

58 Evans, op. cit.

59 Ravenhill, op. cit., p. 311.

60 Alan K. Henrikson, “Niche Diplomacy in the World Public Arena: The Global ‘Corners’ of Canada and Norway”, in Jan Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), pp. 67–87, at p. 67.

61 Ibid.

62 Evan H. Potter, “Niche Diplomacy as Canadian Foreign Policy”, International Journal, Vol. 52, No. 1 (1996/97), pp. 25–38.

63 Oran R. Young, “Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society”, International Organisation, Vol. 45, No. 3 (1991), pp. 281–308.

64 Cooper, Higgott and Nossal, op. cit., pp. 24–25.

65 Norichika Kanie, “Leadership in Multilateral Negotiation and Domestic Policy: The Netherlands at the Kyoto Protocol Negotiation”, International Negotiation, Vol. 8, No. 2 (2003), pp. 339–365, at p. 342.

66 Donna Lee, Middle Powers and Commercial Diplomacy: British Influence at the Kennedy Trade Round (London: Macmillan Press, 1999), pp. 20–24.

67 Richard A. Higgott and Andrew F. Cooper, “Middle Power Leadership and Coalition Building: Australia, the Cairns Group, and the Uruguay Round of Trade Negotiations”, International Organisation, Vol. 44, No. 4 (1990), pp. 589–632.

68 Ralf Emmers and Sarah Teo, “Regional Security Strategies of Middle Powers in the Asia-Pacific”, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 15, No. 2 (2015), pp. 185–216.

69 Ronald M. Behringer, The Human Security Agenda: How Middle Power Leadership Defied US Hegemony (London and New York: Continuum, 2012); Carl Ungerer, “Influence without Power: Middle Powers and Arms Control Diplomacy during the Cold War”, Diplomacy & Statecraft, Vol. 18, No. 2 (2007), pp. 393–414.

70 Higgott and Cooper, op. cit.; Asbjorn Lovbraek, “International Reform and the Like-Minded Countries in the North-South Dialogue 1975–1985”, in Pratt, Middle Power Internationalism, op. cit., pp. 25–68; Bernard Wood, “Towards North-South Middle Power Coalitions”, in Pratt, Middle Power Internationalism, op. cit., pp. 69–107.

71 Ravenhill, op. cit., p. 312.

72 Lee, op. cit., pp. 20–23.

73 Bruce Gilley and Andrew O’Neil, “Conclusion: Seeing beyond Hegemony”, in Gilley and O’Neil, Middle Powers and the Rise of China, op. cit., pp. 237–258, at p. 245; David Hundt, “Middle Powers and the Building of Regional Order: Australia and South Korea Compared”, Korea Observer, Vol. 42, No. 1 (2011), pp. 69–94.

74 David J. Hornsby and Oscar Van Heerden, “South Africa–Canada Relations: A Case of Middle Power (Non)Cooperation?” Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, Vol. 51, No. 2 (2013), pp. 153–172.

75 Key-Young Son, “Middle Powers and the Rise of China: ‘Identity Norms’ of Dependency and Activism and the Outlook for Japan–South Korea Relations vis-à-vis the Great Powers”, Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol. 15, No. 1 (2014), pp. 91–112.

76 Iain Watson, “Middle Powers and Climate Change: The Role of KIA”, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 15, No. 3 (2015), pp. 505–536.

77 Marcos Tourinho, “For Liberalism without Hegemony: Brazil and the Rule of Non-Intervention”, in Oliver Stuenkel and Matthew M. Taylor (eds.), Brazil on the Global Stage: Power, Ideas, and the Liberal International Order (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), pp. 79–94.

78 Alexander Beresford, “A Responsibility to Protect Africa from the West? South Africa and the NATO Intervention in Libya”, International Politics, Vol. 52, No. 3 (2015), pp. 288–304.

79 Mahrukh Doctor, “Brazil’s Role in Institutions of Global Economic Governance: The WTO and G20”, Global Society, Vol. 29, No. 3 (2015), pp. 286–300.

80 Ibid.

81 David R. Black and David J. Hornsby, “South Africa’s Bilateral Relationships in the Evolving Foreign Policy of an Emerging Middle Power”, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, Vol. 54, No. 2 (2016), pp. 151–160.

82 Chris Alden and Maxi Schoeman, “South Africa’s Symbolic Hegemony in Africa”, International Politics, Vol. 52, No. 2 (2015), pp. 239–254; Monica Hirst, “Emerging Brazil: The Challenges of Liberal Peace and Global Governance”, Global Society, Vol. 29, No. 3 (2015), pp. 259–372.

83 Andrew F. Cooper, “MIKTA and the Global Projection of Middle Powers: Toward a Summit of Their Own?” Global Summitry, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2015), pp. 95–114.

84 Ibid.

85 Leslie E. Wehner, “Role Expectations as Foreign Policy: South American Secondary Powers’ Expectations of Brazil as a Regional Power”, Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 11, No. 4 (2015), pp. 435–455.

86 Robert Muggah, “Brazil’s Foreign Policy Is in the Dark”, openDemocracy (20 February 2015), available: <https://www.opendemocracy.net/robert-muggah/brazil%C2%B4s-foreign-policy-is-in-dark> (accessed 1 March 2017).

87 Alan S. Alexandroff, “South Africa in a Complex Global Order: How and Where to Fit In”, South African Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 22, No. 2 (2015), pp. 249–268.

88 Chris Alden and Maxi Schoeman, “Reconstructing South African Identity through Global Summitry”, Global Summitry, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2015), pp. 187–204.

89 John G. Ikenberry, “The Illusion of Geopolitics: The Enduring Power of the Liberal Order”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 93, No. 3 (2014), pp. 80–90.

90 Frank Vogl, “Brazil’s and South Africa’s Watergate Moment: What Happens when Judges Fight Corrupt Political Leaders?” The Globalist (23 March 2016), available: <https://www.theglobalist.com/brazil-south-africa-lessons-of-watergate/> (accessed 1 June 2017).

91 Nukhet A. Sandal, “Middle Powerhood as a Legitimation Strategy in the Developing World: The Cases of Brazil and Turkey”, International Politics, Vol. 51, No. 6 (2014), pp. 693–708.

92 Janis Van Der Westhuizen, “Class Compromise as Middle Power Activism? Comparing Brazil and South Africa”, Government and Opposition, Vol. 48, No. 1 (2013), pp. 80–100.

93 Chris Alden and Marco Antonio Vieira, “The New Diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and Trilateralism”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 7 (2005), pp. 1077–1095.

94 Helen Yanacopulos, “The Janus Faces of a Middle Power: South Africa’s Emergence in International Development”, Journal of Southern African Studies, Vol. 40, No. 1 (2014), pp. 203–216.

95 Steen Fryba Christensen, “Brazil’s Foreign Policy Priorities”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 2 (2013), pp. 271–286.

96 Hirst, op. cit.

97 Jo-Ansie Van Wyk, “Nuclear Diplomacy as Niche Diplomacy: South Africa’s Post-Apartheid Relations with the International Atomic Energy Agency”, South African Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 19, No. 2 (2012), pp. 179–200.

98 Simon Allison, “Think Again: Peeking behind South Africa’s Diplomatic Curtain”, Institute for Strategic Studies (20 October 2016), available: <https://www.issafrica.org/iss-today/think-again-peeking-behind-south-africas-diplomatic-curtain> (accessed 1 March 2017).

99 Laura Neack, “Pathways to Power: A Comparative Study of the Foreign Policy Ambitions of Turkey, Brazil, Canada and Australia”, Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, Vol. 14, No. 2 (2013), pp. 53–73.

100 Gian Luca Gardini, “Brazil: What Rise of What Power?”, Bulletin of Latin American Research, Vol. 35, No. 1 (2016), pp. 5–19.

101 Kai Michael Kenkel and Cristina G. Stefan, “Brazil and the Responsibility while Protecting Initiative”, Global Governance, Vol. 22, No. 1 (2016), pp. 41–58.

102 J. Andrew Grant and Spencer Hamilton, “Norm Dynamics and International Organisations: South Africa in the African Union and International Criminal Court”, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, Vol. 54, No. 2 (2016), pp. 161–185.

103 Alden and Schoeman, “South Africa’s Symbolic Hegemony”, op. cit.

104 Alden and Vieira, op. cit.

105 Bas Hooijmaaijers and Stephan Keukeleire, “Voting Cohesion of the BRICS Countries in the UN General Assembly, 2006–2014: A BRICS Too Far?” Global Governance, Vol. 22, No. 3 (2016), pp. 389–407; Eduard Jordaan, “Rising Powers and Human Rights: The India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum at the UN Human Rights Council”, Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 14, No. 4 (2015), pp. 463–485.

106 Julian Culp, “How Irresponsible Are Rising Powers?” Third World Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 9 (2016), pp. 1525–1536.