96
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

From Family First to the FBI: Children, ideology and Cyberspace

Pages 239-257 | Published online: 13 Dec 2006
 

Abstract

The Internet and child protection are usually discussed as if one inevitably follows the other. This article questions the process by which children are constructed on the Internet and suggests that the ideological agenda of the organisations that advocate the protection of children must be questioned. In particular, it is argued that many of these organisations proceed from a view of the child that is based on a conservative view of family relationships that is not obviously in children's best interests. The problem is that these views of the child have begun to permeate the state apparatus, which itself polices the Internet leading to an orthodoxy that is difficult to challenge.

Notes

1 See http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2005/s1407003.htm (accessed 1 October 2005).

2 See, e.g. crikey.com.au, which documents the links between the Family First Party and Assemblies of God and other religious conservatives.

9 An obvious example would be the ‘paternalistic’ removal of aboriginal children from their families (see, e.g. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Citation1997).

10 Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services vs. JWB[1992] 175 CLR 218 (High Court of Australia).

11 Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services vs. JWB, per Brennan. J. para.

12 See, e.g. Articles 3(2), 5, 7(1), 9(1), 18.

13 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 13(1).

14 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 17.

15 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 17(4).

16 Article 18(1) provides: ‘States Parties shall use their best efforts to ensure recognition of the principle that both parents have common responsibilities for the upbringing and development of the child. Parents or, as the case may be, legal guardians, have the primary responsibility for the upbringing and development of the child. The best interests of the child will be their basic concern’.

24 See, e.g. Australian Broadcasting Authority website: www.cybersmartkids.com; Home Office, Citation2004.

25 http://www.childnet-int.org/about/ (accessed 25 June 2005).

26 http://www.childnet-int.org/about/ (accessed 25 June 2005).

30 N2H2's own virtual press kit acknowledges that ‘Internet Management Services' will grow to a US$750 million market by 2005, up from US$90 million in 1999. N2H2 also claims to have captured 40% of the education filtering market in the United States: http://www.n2h2.com/pdf/virtual_press_kit.pdf (accessed 20 June 2005).

31 http://www.protectkids.com/dangers/stats.htm (accessed 20 June 2005).

32 http://www.protectkids.com/dangers/stats.htm (accessed 20 June 2005).

33 http://www.protectkids.com/dangers/stats.htm (accessed 20 June 2005). The N2H2 statistics are dated 23 September 2003.

34 http://www.afafilter.com/vitalfacts.asp (accessed 20 June, 2005).

35 http://www.afa.net/lif/schools.asp (accessed 20 June, 2005).

38 http://www.efa.org.au/Publish/PR030303.html (accessed 25 June 2005).

40 www.afafilter.com (this is an edited list).

42 http://www.ana.net/family/default.htm (accessed 25 June 2005).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.