![Sample our Law journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5942/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Law.jpg"})
Abstract
In this paper, we examine the soundness of Capper & Susskind's recommended legal expert system development methodology in the areas of knowledge acquisition and knowledge representation. Legal expert systems have not yet had the impact in the United Kingdom that might be expected. We argue that this is partly the result of developers paying insufficient attention to the ‘third estate’: user interfaces. We make suggestions about both the look and feel of legal expert systems, and the facilities that such systems should offer. Lastly, we claim that we have developed an exploratory expert system encapsulating the Brussels Convention 1968 which can contribute to the development of a useful computer‐based guide to an important legal domain.