1,176
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Local policing and transnational organized crime

&
Pages 17-26 | Published online: 09 Sep 2011
 

Abstract

This paper discusses the problems associated with a crime management model that is underpinned by the geographical reach of the investigating agencies, and the merits of different models of policing that work to counter transnational organized crime. It analyzes the different policing approaches to this level of criminality from three organizing frameworks; intelligence led policing, problem-solving policing, and goal-oriented policing. It suggests that there is a puzzle at the heart of any policing solution, based on the principle of subsidiarity – how to link local policing activity with the efforts to tackle national and transnational organized criminality whilst maintaining a democratic mandate that privileges a mutual structure over the conglomerate model. It concludes with a suggestion to look towards an Intelligent Problem Solving solution that prioritizes the grassroots by focusing on threat, harm, and risk within a crime continuum.

Acknowledgements

This article is a summary of the author's chapter in the Routledge Handbook of Transnational Organized Crime, due for publication in November 2011. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors' own and not those of Thames Valley Police.

Notes

M. Innes and J. Sheptycki, ‘From Detection to Disruption: Intelligence and the Changing Logic of Police Crime Control in the United Kingdom’, International Criminal Justice Review 14 (2004).

NCIS, The National Intelligence Model (London: National Criminal Intelligence Service, 2000).

T. John and M. Maguire, ‘Rolling out the National Intelligence Model: Key Challenges’, in Crime Reduction and Problem-Oriented Policing, ed. K. Bullock and N. Tilley (Cullompton: Willan, 2003).

ACPO, Guidance on the National Intelligence Model, National Policing Improvement Agency on behalf of the Association of Chief Police Officers, (London: ACPO, 2005).

C. Harfield, Defining and Defying Organized Crime: Discourse, Perceptions and Reality, ed. F. Allum and F. Longa (Routledge, London, 2009).

Home Office, Manpower, Effectiveness and Efficiency in the Police Service. HOC 114/1983 (London: Home Office, 1983).

Home Office, Regional Crime Squads, HOC 249/1964 (London: Home Office, 1964).

Home Office, Police Manpower, Equipment and Efficiency. HOC 11/1967 (London: Home Office, 1967).

Audit Commission (1991) ‘Reviewing the Organisation of Provincial Police Forces’, Audit Commission Police Paper No 9 (London: Audit Commission, 1991).

HMIC, What Price Policing?: A Study of Efficiency and Value for Money in the Police Service (London: HMIC, 1998).

ACPO, Third Report of the Working Party on a Structure of Criminal Intelligence above Force Level (The Pearce Report) (London: ACPO, 1978).

ACPO, Second Report of the Working Party on Operational Intelligence (The Ratcliffe Report) (London: ACPO, 1986).

House of Commons, Policing in the 21st Century (Home Affairs Select Committee 7th Report, Parliament (London: House of Commons, 2008).

P. Amey, C. Hale and S. Uglow, ‘Development and Evaluation of a Crime Management Model’, Police Research Paper Series, Paper 18 (London: Home Office, 1996).

R. Flanagan, The Review of Policing Final Report, 2008. police.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/police-reform/Review_of_policing_final_report (accessed 24 February 2009).

H. Goldstein, ‘On Further Developing Problem-Orientated Policing: The Most Critical Need, the Major Impediments and a Proposal’, in Problem-Orientated Policing: From Innovation to Mainstream. Crime Prevention Studies vol. 15 (Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 2003) 13–47.

T. John and M. Magurie, ‘The National Intelligence Model: Early Implementation Experience in Three Police Force Areas’ (Working Paper Series no. 50 (School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, 2004)), 18.

Home Office, One Step Ahead: A 21st Century Strategy to Defeat Organised Crime (London: Home Office, 2004).

Home Office, Building Communities Beating Crime: A Better Police Service for the 21st Century, Home Office Policing White Paper (London: Home Office, 2004).

Cabinet Office, The Coalition: our Programme for Government. Cabinet Office, London, 2010. http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/409088/pfg_coalition.pdf

Home Office, Policing in the 21st Century: Reconnecting the Police and the People, Home Office White Paper (London: Home Office, 2010).

HMIC, Closing the Gap: A Review of the ‘Fitness for Purpose’ of the Current Structure of Policing in England and Wales, Denis O'Connor (London: HMI, 2005).

T. John and M. Maguire, The National Intelligence Model: Key Lessons from Early Research. Home Office Online Report 30/04. (Home Office: London, 2004).

T. John and M. Maguire, ‘The National Intelligence Model: Early Implementation Experience in Three Police Force Areas’, Paper no. 50, Working Paper Series, School of Social Sciences (Cardiff: Cardiff University, 2004).

HMSO, Royal Commission on the Police. Final Report Cmnd 1728 (London: HMSO, 1962).

ACPO, Report of Sub Committee on Criminal Intelligence (The Baumber Report) (London: ACPO, 1975).

The Times, ‘SOCA Performance Slammed’, January 24, 2007.

Home Office, From the Neighbourhood to the National: Policing our Communities Together, Home Office Policing Green Paper (London: Home Office, 2008).

S. Gilmour, Understanding Organized Crime: A Local Perspective, Policing 2/1. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 18–27.

P.C. van Duyne, ‘Crime – Enterprises and the Legitimate Industry in the Netherlands’, in Organized Crime and its Containment. A Transatlantic Initiative, eds Cyrille Fijnaut and James Jacobs (Deventer: Kluwer, 1991).

P. Gottschalk and Y.S. Gudmundsen, ‘Police Culture as a Determinant of Intelligence Strategy Implementation’, International Journal of Police Science and Management 11, no. 2 (2009): 170–182.

P. Neyroud and S. Gilmour, ‘Through a Glass Darkly – Some Future Influences on Professional Standards in Policing?’ in The Handbook of Police Ethics and Professional Standards, ed. A. MacVean and P. Spindler (London: New Police Bookshop, 2011).

See Note 4, p. 82.

SOCA Annual Report 2007 / 08: 14.

HMIC, Valuing the Police: Policing in an Age of Austerity (London: HMIC, 2010).

H. Goldstein, ‘Improving Policing: A Crime and Delinquency Problem – Orientated Approach’, Crime and Delinquency 25 (1979): 236–58.

H. Goldstein, Problem-Orientated Policing (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1990).

N. Tilley, Problem-Oriented Policing, Intelligence-Led Policing and the National Intelligence Model, Crime Science: Short Report Series, Jill Dando (London: Institute of Crime Science, 2003), http://www.jdi.ucl.ac.uk/downloads/publications/crime_science_short_reports/problem_oriented_policing.pdf (accessed 20 July 2010).

T. Bateman, ‘Further Increases in the Number of Children Processed by the Youth Justice System in England and Wales’, Youth Justice News (London: Sage, 2008).

Reform, A New Force (London: Reform, 2009).

G. Kelly and S. Muers, Creating Public Value: An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform (Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, 2002).

M. Moore, Creating Public Value (Princeton, NJ: Harvard University Press, 1995).

See Note 21, p. 13.

J. Sheptycki, ‘High Policing in the Security Control Society’, Policing 1, no. 1 (2007): 70–79.

See Note 27, p. 5.

J. Cook, S. Deakin and A. Hughes, ‘Mutuality and Corporate Governance: The Evolution of UK Building Societies following Deregulation’ (ESRC Working Paper 205, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2001).

Building Society Association (2010). Membership details website: http://www.bsa.org.uk/aboutus/buildsocmember.htm (accessed 20 July 2010).

P. Stephenson, ‘Fighting Organised Crime in an Era of Financial Austerity’, John Harris Memorial Lecture (London: The Police Foundation, 2010), http://www.police-foundation.org.uk/files/POLICE0001/jhml%202010/Sir%20Paul%20Stephenson%2012-7-10.pdf (accessed 20 July 2010).

Cabinet Office, Extending Our Reach: A Comprehensive Approach to tackling Serious Organised Crime (London: Cabinet Office Strategy Unit, 2009). ACPO, Practice Advice on the Management of Priority and Volume Crime (the Volume Crime Management Model) (London: ACPO, 2006).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.