The Dematerialization of Print and the Fate of Copyright

This paper contends that copyright is a product of the invention of print. Before that time, writings were seen as part of the common heritage of humanity and if someone copied a book by hand they deserved the right to own the copy. The digitalization of not only print, but also intellectual products such as music, graphics and video has caused problems more deep-seated than many copyright lawyers would admit to. In fact, a paradigm shift has occurred with information at the core. The older paradigm comes from the world of Descartes and Newton and focuses on material things. The legal system of that era correspondingly focused on material things, making it impossible to own, possess or have any other real right in incorporeals. To cover intellectual property a special subsystem of law was designed which is now starting to show the strain. It is argued that information ages quickly and by over-protecting it one loses the value of the asset. Power and wealth will come from transmitting and adding value to information. In this regard personal rights might be more valuable than real or intellectual property rights, unless the latter adapts to change more rapidly.