Community Forest recreation – a dynamic model for our future countryside?

Abstract

The urban fringe is widely acknowledged as an important resource in the sustainable development of sport and active recreation opportunities in the countryside. Its value stems from its close proximity to large sections of population, the variety of landscapes comprising it, and its ability to potentially accommodate some of the growth in non-traditional activities deemed inappropriate by those agencies currently influencing the countryside agenda. Not surprisingly therefore, Community Forests have become a focus for future recreation provision. However, a review of current literature has revealed four constraints which appear to be limiting the scope of this provision. First, a dearth of empirical data has forced planners to make assumptions over recreation demand and damage which has resulted in strategic policies for countryside recreation which are almost universally restrictive. Secondly, local planning authorities may be limiting the effectiveness of national and regional planning guidance within Community Forest areas by prioritizing other countryside issues ahead of recreation. Thirdly, the influence of the Countryside Commission's precautionary philosophy appears to be dominating, and thus limiting recreation objectives within the Forests. Finally, the success of the initiative is reliant upon the dedication of individuals who may not be committed to countryside recreation issues. This article concludes that a comprehensive programme of monitoring and review is required to address these constraints and facilitate the evolution of a more dynamic model for countryside recreation in Community Forests.