1,074
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Older adults’ influence in family care: how do daughters and aging parents navigate differences in care goals?

, &
Pages 46-55 | Received 04 Dec 2014, Accepted 04 May 2015, Published online: 27 May 2015
 

Abstract

Objective: This study seeks to address how older adults influence their daily care when their preferences conflict with those of their adult daughter caregivers.

Method: Using a sample of 10 dyads (N = 20) of an older adult and adult daughter, we utilize content analysis strategies to analyze in-depth, semi-structured interview data with QSR NVIVO to investigate how older adults influence their care, how daughters respond to such efforts of influence, and how dyads navigate differences in care goals.

Results: When there is agreement in goals, dyads report tasks going well and both individuals’ requests are honored. When there are differences in care goals, daughters most frequently reason with their older parents, while parents walk away or ‘let go’ of their requests. Daughters report making decisions for their parents for health or safety-related needs. However, all dyads discuss differences in care goals, whereby parents are perceived as insisting, resisting, or persisting in care.

Conclusion: Findings illustrate complex patterns of responses by families when navigating differences in daily care goals that carry important implications for research and the development of dyadic-based family interventions.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to extend their appreciation to the staff members of The Madlyn and Leonard Abramson Center for Jewish Life who supported project recruitment and to the families who participated in this study. In addition, this work was supported by financial contributions of the Kligman Graduate Fellowship Endowment and the Donald H. Ford Endowment at the Pennsylvania State University.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by financial contributions of the Kligman Graduate Fellowship Endowment and the Donald H. Ford Endowment at the Pennsylvania State University.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.