Socioecological factors and positive aspects of caregiving: findings from the REACH II intervention

Abstract

Objective: Taking a socioecological perspective, this study assessed the relationship of intrapersonal, interpersonal, and organizational factors to positive aspects of caregiving (PAC) for 642 dementia caregivers by racial/ethnic group from the baseline data of the multisite Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health II (REACH II) intervention.

Methods: Nine intrapersonal indicators, 4 interpersonal indicators, and 12 organizational indicators were used. Blocked-multiple regression analyses by three racial/ethnic groups were computed to examine significant factors related to PAC among caregivers after controlling for memory and behavioral problems.

Results: Data showed a significant difference in PAC and significantly different indicators of PAC by racial/ethnic group. Hispanic caregivers reported the highest level of PAC while White participants showed the lowest scores on the measure of PAC. Education, marital status, and using formal transportation services were significant predictors for PAC among Hispanic caregivers; age, education, caregiving duration, and received social support were significant for PAC among African American caregivers; and sex, education, being a spousal caregiver, satisfaction with social support, using help from homemaker and visiting nurse services, and participating in support groups were significant among White caregivers.

Conclusion: Findings indicate that PAC varies significantly across the three studied racial/ethnic groups of family caregivers and that intrapersonal, interpersonal, and organizational factors relate uniquely to PAC. Additional investigations of PAC could serve an important role in the development of family caregiving supports and services.

Keywords:

• positive aspects of caregiving
• REACH II
• dementia caregivers

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jennifer L. Thorud and Donna Sanchez for proofreading and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.