255
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

No cross-sectional evidence for an increased relation of cognitive and sensory abilities in old ageFootnote1

, , &
Pages 409-415 | Received 05 May 2015, Accepted 05 Oct 2015, Published online: 07 Nov 2015
 

Abstract

Objectives: A key question in gerontological research concerns whether good functioning can be maintained in some cognitive abilities in old age, even if deficits occur in other cognitive or sensory abilities. Our goals were to investigate relations of cognitive and sensory abilities in old age, whether these relations differed in size across old age, and whether this was affected by general cognitive ability (processing speed), educational level, and/or general health status.

Methods: Two thousand eight hundred and twelve older adults (aged 65–101, M = 77.9 years) from the Vivre–Leben–Vivere survey served as cross-sectional sample for the present study. We administered psychometric tests on processing speed (the speed of cognitive processing), cognitive flexibility (the ability to alternate between cognitive operations), and verbal abilities (vocabulary). In addition, we interviewed individuals on their hearing, eyesight, educational level, and general health status. We regressed sizes of relations between abilities (calculated within each 1-year age tranche) on mean age within the corresponding age tranche, with the number of participants within the corresponding age tranche as case weights.

Results: We observed a decrease in relations between processing speed and cognitive flexibility in old age that was particularly pronounced in individuals with high educational level (r = −.41). In contrast, we did not find differences in relations between other cognitive and sensory abilities across old age, which held for different levels of general cognitive ability, education, and general health status.

Conclusion: Present data do not support the view of a generally increased relation of cognitive and sensory abilities in old age.

Acknowledgements

We thank Christopher Hertzog for his helpful comments on a prior version of this manuscript. This publication benefited from the support of the Swiss National Centre of Competences in Research LIVES – Overcoming vulnerability: life course perspectives, granted by the Swiss National Science Foundation. The authors are grateful to the Swiss National Science Foundation for its financial assistance.

Disclosure Statement

We declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

The Swiss National Centre of Competences in Research LIVES – Overcoming vulnerability: life course perspectives, granted by the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.