1,073
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Sensory loss and its consequences for couples’ psychosocial and relational wellbeing: an integrative review

, &
Pages 337-347 | Received 06 Aug 2015, Accepted 10 Dec 2015, Published online: 07 Jan 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Previous research has shown that marital communication is key to couples' successful illness adjustment. However, little is known about couples' experiences of health conditions characterised by communication difficulties such as acquired hearing, vision, and dual-sensory loss. The aim of this review was to identify the effect of sensory loss, and associated communication difficulties, on couples' relational and psychosocial adjustment.

Method: A systematic search was conducted to identify studies investigating the social, psychological, and relational impact of sensory loss on couples.

Results: Twenty-four articles met the criteria for inclusion in the review. Significant heterogeneity in the measurements and design of the quantitative studies prevented statistical data synthesis. All but two studies reported some effect of sensory loss on couples' psychosocial or relational wellbeing. Higher levels of marital satisfaction were found to buffer against adverse psychological outcomes. Results of quantitative and qualitative studies were synthesised to form an integrative model illustrating the associations between sensory loss and couples' relational and psychosocial wellbeing.

Conclusions: Although this review reports an association between sensory loss and couples' relational and psychosocial wellbeing, the results should be viewed with caution given that relatively few studies on couples' experiences of acquired sensory loss exist, and many have methodological limitations.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to sincerely thank Flemming Ask Larsen for his valuable contributions to this article. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Review Board of the Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the VELUX Foundation [grant number VELUX33847].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.