2,676
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Family close but friends closer: exploring social support and resilience in older spousal dementia carers

, &
Pages 1222-1228 | Received 18 Feb 2016, Accepted 01 Jul 2016, Published online: 20 Jul 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Spousal dementia carers have unique support needs; they are likely to disengage from their existing social networks as they need to devote more time to caring as the disease progresses. Previously we showed that support resources can facilitate resilience in carers, but the relationship is complex and varies by relationship type. The current paper aims to explore social support as a key component of resilience to identify the availability, function and perceived functional aspects of support provided to older spousal dementia carers.

Method: We conducted 23 in-depth qualitative interviews with spousal carers from two carer support groups and a care home in North West England.

Results: Family and friends served a wide range of functions but were equally available to resilient and non-resilient participants. Family support was perceived as unhelpful if it created feelings of over-dependence. Participants were less likely to resist involvement of grandchildren due to their relatively narrow and low-level support functions. Friend support was perceived as most helpful when it derived from those in similar circumstances. Neighbours played a functionally unique role of crisis management. These perceptions may moderate the effect of support on resilience.

Conclusion: Family and friend support is not always sufficient to facilitate resilience. Support functions facilitate resilience only if they are perceived to match need. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks are due to the men and women who shared their stories in this study. The authors thank Lauren Walsh and Naomi Hayes for their kind data contributions and Anna Freeman for transcription.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the School of Psychology at the University of Liverpool.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.