2,105
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Psychological Morbidity and Emotional Well-Being

Social and leisure activity profiles and well-being among the older adults: a longitudinal study

, , , , &
Pages 77-83 | Received 16 Jun 2017, Accepted 15 Oct 2017, Published online: 21 Nov 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Studies highlight the beneficial effects of social and leisure activities on the well-being of aging people. Our aims were: to investigate activity profiles among older adults living in their own homes, to highlight potential changes in profiles over a period of five years and to examine effects of differences between these profiles on well-being variables.

Methods: Three waves were considered in this longitudinal study, with 550, 410 and 374 people (76, 79, 82 years on average), respectively. We used cluster analysis to obtain activity profiles of social and leisure activities, ANOVAs with age and external variables (satisfaction with life, time occupation satisfaction, self-esteem and depression) to explore differences between cluster groups, and chi-square tests of association to explore whether the same individual belonged to the same activity profile over time.

Results: The number of clusters decreased strongly from the first wave to the other two waves (n = 7 to n = 2 and 3). Two main types of activity differentiated the profiles: social activities (voluntary work and associations) and recreational activities outside the home/at home. The activities showed no systematic or strong effects on external variables, nevertheless for the oldest subjects when comparing the less active to the more active (recreational profile and social profile) the latter expressed a greater satisfaction of time occupation and self-esteem, and lower scores of depressive symptoms.

Conclusions: Such activities could be an indicator of a certain independence (physical and mental availability) which plays a strong role in the well-being of older adults.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article.

Notes

1. The first assessment (2001) comprised 906 participants with a mean age of 72.5 years (SD = 5.9, range = 62–95). In 2001 and 2003, activities practiced by participants were not assessed.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.