3,217
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Age differences in the use of emotion regulation strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation: a systematic review

&
Pages 1-14 | Received 02 May 2017, Accepted 16 Oct 2017, Published online: 17 Nov 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This review examines differences in the use of emotion regulation (ER) strategies among younger and older adults.

Method: A systematic review using search terms related to ageing and ER identified 23 relevant studies. Narrative synthesis was adopted to analyse the findings.

Results: Generally, greater use of situation selection and attentional deployment was identified among older adults, although these relationships were dependent on contextual/moderator variables. While older adults employed greater levels of situation modification in response to negative stimuli, there was considerable variation in age differences across specific situation modification subtypes. Available evidence pointed to an absence of age differences in the cognitive change strategy of cognitive reappraisal. The use of relatively less-cognitively demanding cognitive change subtypes (e.g. acceptance) was, under particular circumstances, greater among older adults. Findings regarding the response modulation strategy of expressive suppression were equivocal.

Conclusion: Adult development is not characterised by straightforward shifts in preferences for use of different ER strategies. Moderator variables appear to be of central importance in shaping the emergence of age differences in ER. Systematically examining interactions of age with individual difference variables and situational factors in samples including oldest-old adults will be important for advancing knowledge regarding developmental differences in ER.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Notes

1. Our modified version of the Downs and Black Quality Checklist (Citation1998) included items 1-3, 5-7, 10-12, 16, 18, 20, 25, & 27. Items 4, 8, 9, 13-15, 17, 19, 21-24, & 26 were excluded.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research [grant number CE1101029].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.