963
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
International Studies: Africa and Europe

Validation of Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic in a sample of elderly Egyptians with neurocognitive disorders

, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 551-557 | Received 26 Jul 2017, Accepted 11 Jan 2018, Published online: 09 Feb 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MoCA-B) is a modified version of the MoCA that is especially suitable for use in elderly subjects with low education. The Authors translated the tool into Arabic and they aimed at validation of this tool in a sample of elderly Egyptians.

Methods: The study included 93 patients, 60 years and older, fulfilling the DSM-5 criteria of Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (NCD) (39 patients) and Major Neurocognitive Disorder (54 patients) that were compared to 112 community dwelling elder subjects. All subjects were assessed using the MoCA-B, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) in addition to the required laboratory and radiological investigations.

Results: MoCA-B demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.915) and content validity in discrimination between normal and diseased subjects. It showed superior sensitivity and specificity when compared to MMSE in screening for Mild NCD (AUC MoCA-B = 0.988 versus MMSE = 0.939). The recommended cut-off was 21/22 with sensitivity of 92.5% and specificity of 98.2% for detecting Mild NCD and 16/17 with sensitivity of 90.7% and specificity of 97.4% for detecting Major NCD (dementia).

Conclusion: The Arabic MoCA-B is a valid cognitive assessment tool in elderly Egyptian subjects.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Ziad Nasreddine the copyright owner of the MoCA test, Cairo University Geriatric Social Center directors, employees and members for their collaboration and efforts, Cairo University Language and Translation Center for translation service and Nermin Hany Mosaad, clinical psychologist in Psychiatry & Addiction Medicine Hospital.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This research was not funded by any institution or company.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.