375
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Measurement

Verbal test of practical judgment (VPJ): a new test of judgment that predicts functional skills for older adults

, , &
Pages 718-726 | Received 09 Oct 2017, Accepted 04 Mar 2018, Published online: 23 Mar 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The clinical assessment of older adults’ judgment is important for mitigating safety risks that often precipitate loss of independence. Our national survey of geriatric healthcare providers (N = 496; M years of experience = 17.11 ± 10.60) indicated that formal judgment tests are underutilized in clinical practice. We developed the Verbal Test of Practical Judgment (VPJ) as a new test of judgment for older adults intended to identify difficulty performing instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).

Method: In two prospective studies, participants were long-term care facility residents (age ≥ 50) in Maryland, USA (Study 1, N = 51; Study 2, N = 110) referred to licensed psychologists for neuro-cognitive and mood evaluation by facility attending physicians. Psychometric analyses were performed to examine the construct validity of the VPJ.

Results: The VPJ evidenced adequate reliability and strong construct validity across both studies. Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded an optimal VPJ cut score for identifying impaired judgment. The VPJ significantly predicted IADL performance beyond clinician and participant ratings.

Conclusion: The VPJ appears to be a valid tool for assessing judgment among older adults with suspected cognitive impairment. VPJ score inferences can inform clinicians on the odds of requiring assistance for specific IADLs.

View correction statement:
Erratum

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kevin Lawlor, PsyD, Alex Lupus, PhD, and Tracey Phillips, PhD for their assistance with data collection and Ali Breden for data entry.

Disclosure statement

The corresponding author has ownership rights of the Verbal Test of Practical Judgment (VPJ).

Additional information

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.