Public knowledge of the influence of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors on dementia: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objectives

This systematic review examined whether the general public are aware of the influence of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) on dementia.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, five electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Scopus) were searched for studies published from 2009–2019, using the key terms “knowledge,” “modifiable cardiovascular risk factors,” and “dementia.” Standardized critical appraisal instruments were used to evaluate the quality of the studies.

Results

Of the 1,533 articles that were screened, 26 were included in this review. Modifiable CVRFs of dementia included behavioral factors (physical inactivity, poor dietary practices, high alcohol consumption, and heavy smoking) and medical conditions (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and obesity). Although the association between CVRFs and dementia was identified (pooled prevalence is 24–50%), overall knowledge about this relationship in the general public was low. Sociodemographic variables, such as higher education, better economic status, and prior contact with a person with dementia, positively influenced dementia risk knowledge. Ethnic minorities showed good awareness of dementia risk from cardiovascular-related conditions.

Conclusion

Despite dementia is considered as a public health priority by World Health Organization, knowledge of the modifiable CVRFs and dementia is low in the general population. Public health policymakers should develop appropriate educational programs and interventions to equip the communities and vulnerable groups with this understanding so that they can be prepared to reduce dementia risk.

Keywords:

• Dementia
• modifiable cardiovascular risk factors
• public knowledge
• systematic review
• meta-analysis

Disclosure statement

All authors contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study, and to the revision of the submitted manuscript. No conflicts of interest have been identified in connection with this review. This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies.