Notes
Research Support Libraries Group, Final Report, 2003, available at http://www.rslg.ac.uk
Making the Links: Improving the UK ILL System, Conference Proceedings 2000, http://www.bl.uk/concord/mtlmins.html
Ibid
The initial part of this section which summarises the history and operation of the British Library/BLDSC is based on a paper produced for the RSLG, and is used with permission.
Useful annual summaries of developments in interlending have been produced in recent years by Stephen Prowse. For example, see Prowse, S. Trends and developments in interlending and document delivery in the UK in 1997. Interlending and Document Supply, 26(2), 1998, and subsequent issues.
Line, M. National interlending systems: Existing systems and possible models. Interlending Review, 7(2), 1979.
See the recent study that we undertook for RSLP on library collaboration: Schofield, A. et al. Barriers to resource sharing among higher education libraries: A report to the research support libraries programme. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 7, 2001.
http://www.arl.org
For details see http://www.ala.org/rusa/stnd_Inc.html
For details see http://www.rlg.org/shares/agree.html
For details see http://www.rlg.org/illman/illmanfeat.html
Kohl, D. F. Farewell to all that… Transforming collection development to fit the virtual library context: the OhioLINK experience. In Schwartz, C. A. (ed.) Restructuring Academic Libraries: Organizational Development in the Wake of Technological Change. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 1997. 108–120.
For detail see http://www.nla.gov.au/initiatives/ilrscode/ilrscode.html
Ruthven, T. and Magnay, S. Top performing interlending operations: Results of the Australian Benchmarking Study. Interlending and Document Supply, 30(2), 2002, 73–79.
http://www.nla.gov.au/initiatives/nrswg
For details see http://amicus.nlc-bnc.ca/aaweb/amilogine.htm
See http://www.nlc-bnc.ca/ill/s16-202-e.html
For a discussion of the issues here see our recent study on library collaboration for the RSLP: Barriers to Resource Sharing Among Higher Education Libraries, 2001, http://www.rslp.ac.uk
We have not attempted an exclusive analysis of ILL management software systems, whether as part of an overall library management system or not. The BLDSC has a factsheet on ILL software suppliers that could form the basis of a comprehensive comparison, if required at http://www.bl.uk/services/document/pdf_files/Factsheet-D5.pdf
The BLDSC monograph lending data cited in this chapter excludes individual copies of articles and serials, but includes special collections of serials where a number of articles may be bound together in a single volume.
See http://www.bl.uk/services/document/pricesuk.html
Thompson, F.M. Access to resources. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 5, 1999, 143–148.
For details see http://www.rlg.org/shares/agree.html
See http://thecombinedregions.com
See http://thenortheast.com/conarls/ILLstand.pdf
Clinton, P. Charging users for interlibrary loans in UK university libraries. Interlending and Document Supply, 27(1), 1999.
See, for example, the experience of the CORSALL scheme in the East Midlands, Bloor I, CORSALL, Collaboration in Research Support by Academic Libraries in Leicestershire, 2001, de Montfort University.
ARL. Jackson, M. (1999) Measuring the performance of interlibrary loan operations. Proceedings of the 6th Interlending and Document supply International Conference. Pretoria, 209–213.
National Library of Australia (2001) Interlibrary Loan and Document Delivery Benchmarking Study. For the National Resource Sharing Working Group.
For details see http://www.illos.lancs.ac.uk/features.html
See the RSLP study on barriers to resource sharing among higher education libraries, 2002. Available at http:\\www.rslp.ac.uk/circs/
CORSALL. Collaboration in research support by academic libraries in Leicestershire, 2001.
See http://libweb.uoregon.edu
See http://webdoc.library.upenn.edu/borrowdirect/