Abstract
This paper looks at the split between affective/experiential and cognitive/theoretical learning in therapeutic trainings and how trainings linked to either educational or independent institutes are in danger of not only mirroring this split, but acting it out. It is suggested that this dichotomy goes to the heart of the profession not least in the issue of how therapeutic change comes about. It is suggested that an integration of ‘knowledge’ and ‘experience’ is required in the training of reflective practitioners and that this can only be achieved through an ongoing dialogue between those involved in training clinicians.