ABSTRACT
Biodiversity conservation measures designed to ensure ecological connectivity depend on the reliable modeling of species movements. Least-cost path modeling makes it possible to identify the most likely dispersal paths within a landscape and provide two items of ecological relevance: (i) the spatial location of these least-cost paths (LCPs) and (ii) the accumulated cost along them (’cost distance’, CD). This spatial analysis requires that cost values be assigned to every type of land cover. The sensitivity of both LCPs and CDs to the cost scenarios has not been comprehensively assessed across realistic landscapes and diverging cost scenarios. We therefore assessed it in diverse landscapes sampled over metropolitan France and with widely diverging cost scenarios. The spatial overlap of the LCPs was more sensitive to the cost scenario than the CD values were. In addition, highly correlated CD matrices can be derived from very different cost scenarios. Although the range of the cost values and the properties of each cost scenario significantly influenced the outputs of LCP modeling, landscape composition and configuration variables also explained their variations. Accordingly, we provide guidelines for the use of LCP modeling in ecological studies and conservation planning.
Acknowledgements
We are particularly grateful to ARP-Astrance team for its constant support along the project. Part of the analyses were carried out on the calculation ”Mésocentre” facilities of the University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté. We thank Christopher Sutcliffe for revising the English manuscript
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data and codes availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in figshare at https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_from_Cost_distances_and_least_cost_paths_respond_differently_to_cost_scenario_variations_/14924214
Besides, the functions sample_raster(), graphab_link(), mat_cost_dist() and link_compar() respectively used for sampling points within landscapes, computing LCPs between these points, computing cost distances and comparing LCPs spatially have been included into the R package graph4lg and are directly available here: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/graph4lg/index.htmlhttps://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/graph4lg/index.html. The OSO land cover raster data are available here: https://www.theia-land.fr/product/carte-doccupation-des-sols-de-la-France-metropolitaine/https://www.theia-land.fr/product/carte-doccupation-des-sols-de-la-France-metropolitaine/.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Paul Savary
Paul Savary is a PhD searcher at Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté and is financed by the ARP-Astrance company. He has been working on the influence of habitat connectivity on genetic diversity and differentiation patterns using spatial graphs.
Jean Christophe Foltête
Jean Christophe Foltête is a Professor of geography at Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté. His research topics include the spatial modeling of ecological networks. He led the development of Graphab, a software application dedicated to habitat connectivity analyses, and since then is leading or involved in research projects in ecology and landscape and urban planning.
Stéphane Garnier
Stéphane Garnier is a Senior lecturer in ecology at Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté. He has led several research projects on the influence of habitat amount, fragmentation and connectivity on population genetics and host-parasite interactions.
PS designed the study, carried out the analyses and wrote the first draft. All co-authors significantly contributed to the correction of the initial manuscript and responses to the reviewers.