302
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Citizen deliberation at South Carolina’s ‘Our Coastal Future Forum’: Talking through risk related to climate change

, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 764-777 | Received 28 Jun 2021, Accepted 05 Dec 2021, Published online: 29 Dec 2021
 

Abstract

Deliberative democracy has increasingly been used as a form of citizen engagement and involvement in risk-related and environmental domains. However, there is much to learn about how citizens talk about and understand risks related to climate change in the context of community deliberative forums, and how deliberation might contribute to productive climate policy solutions. To contribute to this growing body of work, we use the lens of Construal Level Theory (CLT) to analyze transcripts from a large community forum held in the US state of South Carolina. Our analysis reveals a broad range of risk construal from deliberative participants, with many people discussing climate risks as psychologically near despite the longer horizon often associated with climate change. The results suggest that deliberative forums can be useful venues for helping citizens grapple with the myriad risks and construal levels associated with climate change. Rather than simply helping move climate risks ‘closer’ to people, deliberation might be more useful in allowing people to understand climate risks at multiple levels of psychological distance and leveraging this nuanced understanding to develop potential solutions and mitigation strategies.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Matthew Nowlin, Susan Lovelace, Lee Bundrick, and South Carolina Sea Grant for their support of and contributions to the Our Coastal Future Forum and the data produced from this project.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 Involvement of participants in the deliberative forum, recording and transcription, and subsequent analysis of transcripts were approved by the College of Charleston Institutional Review Board, IRB-2017-01-18-093153. Participants in the forum provided informed oral consent to participate.

Additional information

Funding

This project was supported by a National Academy of Sciences Gulf Research Program grant (16-0730).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.